⌕

JEPQ vs QYLD: holdings overlap and fees

click a fund to swap · any US ETF
Head-to-head
MetricJEPQ · winner 5 of 7QYLD
Expense ratio
annual fee
0.35%0.60%
Assets (AUM)
bigger = more liquid
$43.2B$8.6B
Holdings
number of positions
111103
Top-10 concentration
lower = more spread
43.0%48.9%
Distribution yield (TTM)
trailing 12 months, as of Oct 16, 2026
11.7%11.6%
1-yr total return
dividend-adjusted
+15.7%+20.1%
Fee drag · $100k / 10y
what the fee costs
$6,341$10,757
THE VERDICT

JEPQ and QYLD share 73% of their holdings by weight, similar baskets with some positions that differ. The positions each fund weights more heavily are shown below.

Holdings overlap · Σ min(weight in JEPQ, weight in QYLD)
Portfolio overlap
73%overlap
Shared holdings75
Total unique names120
In one, not the other45
Top shared holdings · weight in JEPQ / QYLD
Which 75 names both funds hold, at what weight, and which positions each fund weights more heavily, is on a paid plan.Premium · $119/yr · 7-day trial · cancel anytimeUnlock the shared names →
Heavier in JEPQ · Heavier in QYLD

Where each fund leans is withheld with the shared names above, on the same plan.

Portfolio look-through · “am I secretly all-in on one stock?”
Your holdings:

Overlap computed Oct 19, 2026 from each fund's published holdings via the weighted-minimum method. Bond and fund-of-funds holdings are excluded from look-through where disaggregation is unreliable. Decision-support, not a recommendation · Not investment advice.

Install Tenet on your phone

Tenet home pageMethodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc.

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.