⌕

QQQI vs QQQM: holdings overlap and fees

click a fund to swap · any US ETF
Head-to-head
MetricQQQIQQQM · winner 4 of 7
Expense ratio
annual fee
0.68%0.15%
Assets (AUM)
bigger = more liquid
$14.9B$109.5B
Holdings
number of positions
102106
Top-10 concentration
lower = more spread
46.9%47.0%
Distribution yield (TTM)
trailing 12 months, as of Oct 16, 2026
14.3%0.5%
1-yr total return
dividend-adjusted
+14.1%+18.9%
Fee drag · $100k / 10y
what the fee costs
$12,150$2,740
THE VERDICT

QQQI and QQQM share 98% of their holdings by weight, near-identical baskets. Their expense ratios are 0.68% and 0.15%. QQQM is the cheaper of the two.

Holdings overlap · Σ min(weight in QQQI, weight in QQQM)
Portfolio overlap
98%overlap
Shared holdings101
Total unique names101
In one, not the other0
Top shared holdings · weight in QQQI / QQQM
Which 101 names both funds hold, at what weight, and which positions each fund weights more heavily, is on a paid plan.Premium · $119/yr · 7-day trial · cancel anytimeUnlock the shared names →
Heavier in QQQI · Heavier in QQQM

Where each fund leans is withheld with the shared names above, on the same plan.

Portfolio look-through · “am I secretly all-in on one stock?”
Your holdings:

Overlap computed Oct 19, 2026 from each fund's published holdings via the weighted-minimum method. Bond and fund-of-funds holdings are excluded from look-through where disaggregation is unreliable. Decision-support, not a recommendation · Not investment advice.

Install Tenet on your phone

Tenet home pageMethodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc.

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.