⌕

QQQM vs SCHG: holdings overlap and fees

click a fund to swap · any US ETF
Head-to-head
MetricQQQM · winner 4 of 7SCHG
Expense ratio
annual fee
0.15%0.04%
Assets (AUM)
bigger = more liquid
$109.5B$63.0B
Holdings
number of positions
106187 of ~189
Top-10 concentration
lower = more spread
47.0%60.9%
Distribution yield (TTM)
trailing 12 months, as of Oct 16, 2026
0.5%0.4%
1-yr total return
dividend-adjusted
+18.9%+11.4%
Fee drag · $100k / 10y
what the fee costs
$2,740$734
THE VERDICT

QQQM and SCHG share 58% of their holdings by weight; they hold different types of stocks. The sections below show where the two baskets differ and what each costs.

Holdings overlap · Σ min(weight in QQQM, weight in SCHG)
Portfolio overlap
58%overlap
Shared holdings48
Total unique names238
In one, not the other190
Top shared holdings · weight in QQQM / SCHG
Which 48 names both funds hold, at what weight, and which positions each fund weights more heavily, is on a paid plan.Premium · $119/yr · 7-day trial · cancel anytimeUnlock the shared names →
Heavier in QQQM · Heavier in SCHG

Where each fund leans is withheld with the shared names above, on the same plan.

Portfolio look-through · “am I secretly all-in on one stock?”
Your holdings:

Overlap computed Oct 19, 2026 from each fund's published holdings via the weighted-minimum method. Bond and fund-of-funds holdings are excluded from look-through where disaggregation is unreliable. Decision-support, not a recommendation · Not investment advice.

Install Tenet on your phone

Tenet home pageMethodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc.

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.