⌕

VB vs VBR: holdings overlap and fees

click a fund to swap · any US ETF
Head-to-head
MetricVB · winner 4 of 7VBR
Expense ratio
annual fee
0.03%0.05%
Assets (AUM)
bigger = more liquid
$175.8B$64.1B
Holdings
number of positions
1,305 of ~1,357826 of ~841
Top-10 concentration
lower = more spread
5.0%5.7%
Distribution yield (TTM)
trailing 12 months, as of Oct 19, 2026
1.3%1.9%
1-yr total return
dividend-adjusted
+13.8%+16.8%
Fee drag · $100k / 10y
what the fee costs
$551$917
THE VERDICT

VB and VBR share 57% of their holdings by weight; they hold different types of stocks. The sections below show where the two baskets differ and what each costs.

Holdings overlap · Σ min(weight in VB, weight in VBR)
Portfolio overlap
57%overlap
Shared holdings818
Total unique names1298
In one, not the other480
Top shared holdings · weight in VB / VBR
Which 818 names both funds hold, at what weight, and which positions each fund weights more heavily, is on a paid plan.Premium · $119/yr · 7-day trial · cancel anytimeUnlock the shared names →
Heavier in VB · Heavier in VBR

Where each fund leans is withheld with the shared names above, on the same plan.

Portfolio look-through · “am I secretly all-in on one stock?”
Your holdings:

Overlap computed Oct 20, 2026 from each fund's published holdings via the weighted-minimum method. Bond and fund-of-funds holdings are excluded from look-through where disaggregation is unreliable. Decision-support, not a recommendation · Not investment advice.

Install Tenet on your phone

Tenet home pageMethodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc.

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.