⌕
Compare & Overlap

QQQ vs QQQI

Two funds can look different and hold the same stocks. We line them up on cost and composition, then compute how much of their holdings by weight the two share.

click a fund to swap · any US ETF
Head-to-head
MetricQQQ · winner 4 of 7QQQI
Expense ratio
annual fee
0.18%0.68%
Assets (AUM)
bigger = more liquid
$491.7B$14.9B
Holdings
number of positions
105102
Top-10 concentration
lower = more spread
47.0%46.9%
Distribution yield (TTM)
trailing 12 months, as of Oct 16, 2026
0.4%14.3%
1-yr total return
dividend-adjusted
+18.9%+14.1%
Fee drag · $100k / 10y
what the fee costs
$3,284$12,150
THE VERDICT

QQQ and QQQI share 98% of their holdings by weight, near-identical baskets. Their expense ratios are 0.18% and 0.68%. QQQ is the cheaper of the two.

Holdings overlap · Σ min(weight in QQQ, weight in QQQI)
Portfolio overlap
98%overlap
Shared holdings101
Total unique names101
In one, not the other0
Top shared holdings · weight in QQQ / QQQI
Which 101 names both funds hold, at what weight, and which positions each fund weights more heavily, is on a paid plan.Premium · $119/yr · 7-day trial · cancel anytimeUnlock the shared names →
Heavier in QQQ · Heavier in QQQI

Where each fund leans is withheld with the shared names above, on the same plan.

Portfolio look-through · “am I secretly all-in on one stock?”
Your holdings:

Overlap computed Oct 19, 2026 from each fund's published holdings via the weighted-minimum method. Bond and fund-of-funds holdings are excluded from look-through where disaggregation is unreliable. Decision-support, not a recommendation · Not investment advice.

Install Tenet on your phone

Tenet home pageMethodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc.

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.