⌕
Compare & Overlap

QQQM vs XLK

Two funds can look different and hold the same stocks. We line them up on cost and composition, then compute how much of their holdings by weight the two share.

click a fund to swap · any US ETF
Head-to-head
MetricQQQMXLK · winner 5 of 7
Expense ratio
annual fee
0.15%0.08%
Assets (AUM)
bigger = more liquid
$109.5B$124.8B
Holdings
number of positions
10677
Top-10 concentration
lower = more spread
47.0%65.2%
Distribution yield (TTM)
trailing 12 months, as of Oct 16, 2026
0.5%0.5%
1-yr total return
dividend-adjusted
+18.9%+29.6%
Fee drag · $100k / 10y
what the fee costs
$2,740$1,466
THE VERDICT

QQQM and XLK share 54% of their holdings by weight; they hold different types of stocks. The sections below show where the two baskets differ and what each costs.

Holdings overlap · Σ min(weight in QQQM, weight in XLK)
Portfolio overlap
54%overlap
Shared holdings35
Total unique names141
In one, not the other106
Top shared holdings · weight in QQQM / XLK
Which 35 names both funds hold, at what weight, and which positions each fund weights more heavily, is on a paid plan.Premium · $119/yr · 7-day trial · cancel anytimeUnlock the shared names →
Heavier in QQQM · Heavier in XLK

Where each fund leans is withheld with the shared names above, on the same plan.

Portfolio look-through · “am I secretly all-in on one stock?”
Your holdings:

Overlap computed Oct 19, 2026 from each fund's published holdings via the weighted-minimum method. Bond and fund-of-funds holdings are excluded from look-through where disaggregation is unreliable. Decision-support, not a recommendation · Not investment advice.

Install Tenet on your phone

Tenet home pageMethodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc.

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.