⌕
Compare & Overlap

SCHG vs VGT

Two funds can look different and hold the same stocks. We line them up on cost and composition, then compute how much of their holdings by weight the two share.

click a fund to swap · any US ETF
Head-to-head
MetricSCHGVGT
Expense ratio
annual fee
0.04%0.09%
Assets (AUM)
bigger = more liquid
$63.0B$178.0B
Holdings
number of positions
187 of ~189321
Top-10 concentration
lower = more spread
60.9%63.6%
Distribution yield (TTM)
trailing 12 months, as of Oct 16, 2026
0.4%0.4%
1-yr total return
dividend-adjusted
+11.4%+27.2%
Fee drag · $100k / 10y
what the fee costs
$734$1,648
THE VERDICT

SCHG and VGT share 53% of their holdings by weight; they hold different types of stocks. The sections below show where the two baskets differ and what each costs.

Holdings overlap · Σ min(weight in SCHG, weight in VGT)
Portfolio overlap
53%overlap
Shared holdings56
Total unique names447
In one, not the other391
Top shared holdings · weight in SCHG / VGT
Which 56 names both funds hold, at what weight, and which positions each fund weights more heavily, is on a paid plan.Premium · $119/yr · 7-day trial · cancel anytimeUnlock the shared names →
Heavier in SCHG · Heavier in VGT

Where each fund leans is withheld with the shared names above, on the same plan.

Portfolio look-through · “am I secretly all-in on one stock?”
Your holdings:

Overlap computed Oct 19, 2026 from each fund's published holdings via the weighted-minimum method. Bond and fund-of-funds holdings are excluded from look-through where disaggregation is unreliable. Decision-support, not a recommendation · Not investment advice.

Install Tenet on your phone

Tenet home pageMethodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc.

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.