⌕
Compare & Overlap

VB vs VBR

Two funds can look different and hold the same stocks. We line them up on cost and composition, then compute how much of their holdings by weight the two share.

click a fund to swap · any US ETF
Head-to-head
MetricVB · winner 4 of 7VBR
Expense ratio
annual fee
0.03%0.05%
Assets (AUM)
bigger = more liquid
$175.8B$64.1B
Holdings
number of positions
1,305 of ~1,357826 of ~841
Top-10 concentration
lower = more spread
5.0%5.7%
Distribution yield (TTM)
trailing 12 months, as of Oct 19, 2026
1.3%1.9%
1-yr total return
dividend-adjusted
+13.8%+16.8%
Fee drag · $100k / 10y
what the fee costs
$551$917
THE VERDICT

VB and VBR share 57% of their holdings by weight; they hold different types of stocks. The sections below show where the two baskets differ and what each costs.

Holdings overlap · Σ min(weight in VB, weight in VBR)
Portfolio overlap
57%overlap
Shared holdings818
Total unique names1298
In one, not the other480
Top shared holdings · weight in VB / VBR
Which 818 names both funds hold, at what weight, and which positions each fund weights more heavily, is on a paid plan.Premium · $119/yr · 7-day trial · cancel anytimeUnlock the shared names →
Heavier in VB · Heavier in VBR

Where each fund leans is withheld with the shared names above, on the same plan.

Portfolio look-through · “am I secretly all-in on one stock?”
Your holdings:

Overlap computed Oct 20, 2026 from each fund's published holdings via the weighted-minimum method. Bond and fund-of-funds holdings are excluded from look-through where disaggregation is unreliable. Decision-support, not a recommendation · Not investment advice.

Install Tenet on your phone

Tenet home pageMethodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc.

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.