Names whose Qualified Dip verdict passes tonight: an 8–35% pullback in a rising trend, reversal evidence fired, and the hard not-a-value-trap and quality gates both held. Minimum $1B market cap and $5M average daily dollar volume. A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
Receipt · SKY · frozen at run timeClears 4 of 4 published testsOn this list since Sep 25, 2026
SKY — every criterion, its measured value, its published bar and the margin
Verdict
Test
Measured
Bar
Margin
✓Passes
Drawdown context
11.8% off its 52-week high
A yes/no roll-up of the drawdown checks: the pullback is 8 to 35% off the 52-week high, no deeper than this name's own typical pullback, not past the point its previous dips recovered from, in an uptrend above a rising 200-day average, with higher-low structure still intact and more than five days to go before earnings. Every check that has data must hold.
✓Passes
Reversal evidence
3 of 4 signals fired
A yes/no roll-up of four turn signals: a bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions, price back above a rising 50-day average, a higher low, and a volume thrust on the turn. At least three of the four must fire, and the value beside it says how many did.
✓Passes
Trap gate
3 of 3 held
A yes/no roll-up of the not-a-value-trap checks: the stock sits in the cheap half of its own five-year valuation range, earnings estimates are not being cut, and returns on capital are not deteriorating. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
✓Passes
Quality floor
5 of 5 held
A yes/no roll-up of the quality checks: positive operating profit, return on invested capital of 10% or better, a solvent balance sheet, a quality score of at least 50, and revenue growing over five years. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken
$79.61
Not a criterion: the price at which this dip's structure would be considered broken. It is shown for context and never counts toward the verdict.
Receipt · ALAB · frozen at run timeClears 4 of 4 published testsOn this list since Sep 22, 2026
ALAB — every criterion, its measured value, its published bar and the margin
Verdict
Test
Measured
Bar
Margin
✓Passes
Drawdown context
28.6% off its 52-week high
A yes/no roll-up of the drawdown checks: the pullback is 8 to 35% off the 52-week high, no deeper than this name's own typical pullback, not past the point its previous dips recovered from, in an uptrend above a rising 200-day average, with higher-low structure still intact and more than five days to go before earnings. Every check that has data must hold.
✓Passes
Reversal evidence
3 of 4 signals fired
A yes/no roll-up of four turn signals: a bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions, price back above a rising 50-day average, a higher low, and a volume thrust on the turn. At least three of the four must fire, and the value beside it says how many did.
✓Passes
Trap gate
2 of 3 held · 1 no data
A yes/no roll-up of the not-a-value-trap checks: the stock sits in the cheap half of its own five-year valuation range, earnings estimates are not being cut, and returns on capital are not deteriorating. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
✓Passes
Quality floor
4 of 5 held · 1 no data
A yes/no roll-up of the quality checks: positive operating profit, return on invested capital of 10% or better, a solvent balance sheet, a quality score of at least 50, and revenue growing over five years. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken
$249.74
Not a criterion: the price at which this dip's structure would be considered broken. It is shown for context and never counts toward the verdict.
Receipt · SBH · frozen at run timeClears 4 of 4 published tests
SBH — every criterion, its measured value, its published bar and the margin
Verdict
Test
Measured
Bar
Margin
✓Passes
Drawdown context
10.3% off its 52-week high
A yes/no roll-up of the drawdown checks: the pullback is 8 to 35% off the 52-week high, no deeper than this name's own typical pullback, not past the point its previous dips recovered from, in an uptrend above a rising 200-day average, with higher-low structure still intact and more than five days to go before earnings. Every check that has data must hold.
✓Passes
Reversal evidence
3 of 4 signals fired
A yes/no roll-up of four turn signals: a bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions, price back above a rising 50-day average, a higher low, and a volume thrust on the turn. At least three of the four must fire, and the value beside it says how many did.
✓Passes
Trap gate
3 of 3 held
A yes/no roll-up of the not-a-value-trap checks: the stock sits in the cheap half of its own five-year valuation range, earnings estimates are not being cut, and returns on capital are not deteriorating. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
✓Passes
Quality floor
5 of 5 held
A yes/no roll-up of the quality checks: positive operating profit, return on invested capital of 10% or better, a solvent balance sheet, a quality score of at least 50, and revenue growing over five years. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken
$11.98
Not a criterion: the price at which this dip's structure would be considered broken. It is shown for context and never counts toward the verdict.
Receipt · THC · frozen at run timeClears 4 of 4 published tests
THC — every criterion, its measured value, its published bar and the margin
Verdict
Test
Measured
Bar
Margin
✓Passes
Drawdown context
10.3% off its 52-week high
A yes/no roll-up of the drawdown checks: the pullback is 8 to 35% off the 52-week high, no deeper than this name's own typical pullback, not past the point its previous dips recovered from, in an uptrend above a rising 200-day average, with higher-low structure still intact and more than five days to go before earnings. Every check that has data must hold.
✓Passes
Reversal evidence
3 of 4 signals fired
A yes/no roll-up of four turn signals: a bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions, price back above a rising 50-day average, a higher low, and a volume thrust on the turn. At least three of the four must fire, and the value beside it says how many did.
✓Passes
Trap gate
3 of 3 held
A yes/no roll-up of the not-a-value-trap checks: the stock sits in the cheap half of its own five-year valuation range, earnings estimates are not being cut, and returns on capital are not deteriorating. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
✓Passes
Quality floor
5 of 5 held
A yes/no roll-up of the quality checks: positive operating profit, return on invested capital of 10% or better, a solvent balance sheet, a quality score of at least 50, and revenue growing over five years. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken
$183.69
Not a criterion: the price at which this dip's structure would be considered broken. It is shown for context and never counts toward the verdict.
Receipt · BJ · frozen at run timeClears 4 of 4 published tests
BJ — every criterion, its measured value, its published bar and the margin
Verdict
Test
Measured
Bar
Margin
✓Passes
Drawdown context
10.8% off its 52-week high
A yes/no roll-up of the drawdown checks: the pullback is 8 to 35% off the 52-week high, no deeper than this name's own typical pullback, not past the point its previous dips recovered from, in an uptrend above a rising 200-day average, with higher-low structure still intact and more than five days to go before earnings. Every check that has data must hold.
✓Passes
Reversal evidence
3 of 4 signals fired
A yes/no roll-up of four turn signals: a bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions, price back above a rising 50-day average, a higher low, and a volume thrust on the turn. At least three of the four must fire, and the value beside it says how many did.
✓Passes
Trap gate
3 of 3 held
A yes/no roll-up of the not-a-value-trap checks: the stock sits in the cheap half of its own five-year valuation range, earnings estimates are not being cut, and returns on capital are not deteriorating. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
✓Passes
Quality floor
5 of 5 held
A yes/no roll-up of the quality checks: positive operating profit, return on invested capital of 10% or better, a solvent balance sheet, a quality score of at least 50, and revenue growing over five years. A hard gate, so a name that fails it never reaches this list.
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken
$88.51
Not a criterion: the price at which this dip's structure would be considered broken. It is shown for context and never counts toward the verdict.
Click any row for the receipt: every criterion with its live value and pass rule. Score is the Tenet composite (sector-relative, 0–100).
Common questions
How does this screen tell a dip from a falling knife?
This screen answers that mechanically with four groups of checks. The drawdown group asks whether the fall is 8 to 35% off the 52-week high, no deeper than this name's own typical pullback, not past the point its previous dips recovered from, inside an uptrend above a rising 200-day average, with higher-low structure still intact and the name more than five days clear of its earnings date. The reversal group looks for a turn actually in progress. The not-a-value-trap and quality groups are hard gates on the business itself. A falling knife fails the last two.
How many stocks are on Dip Radar today?
5 of 2386 screened US names (as of 2026-10-01). The list is usually short, because a pullback deep enough to matter and a business healthy enough to pass the hard gates rarely coincide. Up to the top 5 publish in the free view with their full receipts, and anything beyond that comes with Premium.
What is the invalidation level on each name?
Each row carries a price at which that dip's structure would be considered broken. It is context, not one of the tested criteria, and it never counts toward whether a name qualifies. It exists so the thesis on a given name is falsifiable rather than open-ended.
Is this a signal to buy?
No. It is a research screen that reports which names currently satisfy a published set of pullback and quality checks, recomputed nightly. It models no entry price, no position size and no exit.
Every row carries its qualifying math, frozen at run time.
Tenet is educational research, not investment advice.
