$47.52−1.87 (−3.79%)
At close: Oct 1, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Arxis Inc. · Statistics
Cheap or expensive, strong or fragile. Every ratio ranked against its sector peers — the number we score — with its own ten-year record shown beside it for context.
VALUE
Rich vs sector
premium price vs peers
QUALITY
Weak
below-peer returns
HEALTH
Stable
manageable balance sheet
GROWTH
Fast
compounding quickly
In one line
A weak business at a rich price for its sector: value 8, quality 27, health 52, growth 72, each a percentile within Industrials.
On October 2, 2026 the Tenet Score and these statistics moved from the latest fiscal year to the trailing twelve months, for companies that file quarterly statements. Scores before October 2, 2026 were computed on fiscal-year figures.
Every figure here is from the latest fiscal year. The note under each row says why.track = where peers land, worse → better (direction-adjusted: right always means better)▏sector median● you are here▲ where today's value sits in the company's own 10-year record (context, not scored)hover any metric for its formula
Valuation
8th pctilepremium price vs peersEBIT (operating income) for the latest fiscal year ÷ enterprise value on the current market cap (Greenblatt). The vendor's own earnings yield is net income to common ÷ market cap, a different figure.0.5%2nd pctileown record too shortFiscal 2025 EBIT ÷ enterprise value at the close of Oct 1, 2026Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
6.125th pctileown record too shortMarket cap at the close of Oct 1, 2026 ÷ book equity, fiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
Financial health
52nd pctilemanageable balance sheet5.0695th pctileown record too shortFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
(Cash, short-term investments and receivables) ÷ current liabilities, as the data vendor builds it. Its receivables include non-trade receivables, which Tenet's balance sheet shows inside other current assets.3.7495th pctileown record too shortFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
Total debt less cash and short-term investments, over EBITDA (operating income plus depreciation and amortisation) from the filed statements. Long-term investments are not counted as cash. For some companies they include marketable securities held for more than a year.7.6×4th pctileown record too shortTenet-derived Total debt less cash and short-term investments, over EBITDA (operating income plus depreciation and amortisation) from the filed statements. Long-term investments are not counted as cash. For some companies they include marketable securities held for more than a year. Computed by Tenet from the filed statements (formula house-nde.v1), because the data vendor published no value for this year.Fiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
Profitability & returns
27th pctilebelow-peer returns1%13th pctileown record too shortFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
−1%13th pctileown record too shortFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
47.3%72nd pctileown record too shortFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
−3.1%8th pctileown record too shortFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its quarters do not line up with its fiscal year
Altman's bankruptcy-distance score for the latest fiscal year, with its market-value term at the fiscal year end; higher is safer, as the data vendor publishes it (vendor definition, not reproduced).—excluded: no value on file for this company
Growth
72nd pctilecompounding quicklyThe yearly rate that compounds the oldest fiscal year's revenue into the latest one, over the true number of fiscal years between them (up to five).—excluded: no value on file for this company
★ Corrected metrics: why we compute these ourselves
the receipts behind the numbers aboveGreenblatt earnings yield0.5%EBIT ÷ EV The vendor's "earningsYield" is NI ÷ market cap, which is not Greenblatt's formula.
ROIC1%NOPAT ÷ invested capital The vendor's simple ROIC, not its tiny-base roic tag; withheld when a negative EBIT flips its sign.
Interest coverage0.6× EBIT ÷ interest expense, ranked within sector peers.
Every raw line behind these ratios→
All three statements: 5 years free, 10 on Premium, 20 on Ultimate
Quarterly, in fiscal years: 1 free, 5 on Premium, Unlimited on Ultimate
These percentiles feed the value, income, timing and long-hold tenets→
See which criteria pass, with the live number and the rule behind each
Percentiles computed nightly against 495 Industrials peers from our ingested fundamentals DB · raw statements for corrected metrics. Direction-adjusted: for "lower is better" ratios (P/E, D/E…) the percentile is flipped so right always means better. The percentile is the stock's rank among sector peers, the number that is scored. The triangle marks where the current value sits in the company's own ten-year annual record, shown for context and never blended into the score. Computed 2026-10-02 · Not investment advice.