$3.27−0.04 (−1.23%)
At close: Oct 2, 2026, 12:30 PM ET
Naas Technology Inc · Tenets
How NAAS measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
1 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
1
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
4
within one input of the gate
FAILS
2
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
10
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 5 known)Unknown — no dataROE ≥ 15%— · ≥ 15.0%
Unknown — no dataGross margin ≥ 40%— · ≥ 40.0%
Unknown — no dataNet margin ≥ 15%— · ≥ 15.0%
Unknown — no dataDebt/equity ≤ 0.5— · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)Free cash flow was negative in fiscal 2025.no · > 0
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 5 checks below carry data.Buffett Quality under The screens ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
✕ 1 / 9FailsReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)−144.0% · > 0
FailsOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)−$2.7M · > 0
FailsReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)−140.5% → −144.0%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)−$2.7M vs −$64.3M
FailsLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)7.8% → 25.9%
FailsCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)0.33 → 0.19
FailsNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)+1124.9%
FailsGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)This company files on a financial-statement template with no gross-profit line (banks and insurers do not report one), so gross margin could not be measured for either year. It still scores 0 under this module's conservative rule (a point is never awarded without evidence), and it is not counted as one of the signals we were able to measure.no
FailsAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.00 → 0.00
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 1 of 9. 1 of 9 carry no data.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)Unknown — no dataROIC ≥ 15%— · ≥ 15.0%
Unknown — no dataNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×— · ≤ 3.0×
FailsAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)−41.10 · ≥ 3.00
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data.Munger Compounders under The screens ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)FailsEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)−$38.0M · > 0
Unknown — no dataEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%— · ≥ 6.0%
Unknown — no dataReturn on capital ≥ 25%— · ≥ 25.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Magic Formula is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
— Insufficient inputs (3 of 7 known)PassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$4.6B · ≥ $2.0B
FailsCurrent ratio ≥ 2(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)0.19 · ≥ 2.00
FailsPositive EPS 10y6y
Unknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr— · ≥ 3.0%
Unknown — no dataP/E ≤ 15— · ≤ 15.00
Unknown — no dataP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5— · ≤ 22.50
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 3 of 7 checks below carry data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
Unknown — no dataEPS growth 10–30%— · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)— · 1.0%–8.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout— · ≤ 4.0×
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)— · ≥ 10.00
Unknown — no dataNo dividend cut in the last 5 years—
Unknown — no data5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr— · ≥ 5.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataPayout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 6 checks below carry data.Dividend Growth under The screens ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
— Insufficient inputs (2 of 5 known)FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years1 of 4 on file
Not scored: see the reason belowRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 yearsFive-year revenue history is incomplete in our data, so the compounding rate can't be computed yet.— · ≥ 8.0%
FailsNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)130.2% · ≤ 1.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%Free-cash-flow margin isn't derivable yet from the statements we have on file.— · ≥ 12.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)Cash-flow-to-earnings quality isn't available in our data for this period.— · ≥ 1.00
Reading: does not hold. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check130.2%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 2 of 5 checks below carry data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
~ BorderlinePassesOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)22.2% · 8.0%–35.0%
PassesDip within its own normal pullback band0.17
PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from0.13
FailsA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)2.90
PassesHigher-low structure still intactstructure intact · higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 6 carry no data.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✓ QualifiesPassesA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions7.00 · ≤ 10.00
PassesReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA3.21
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)0.95 · ≥ 1.20
PassesReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)3.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The badge above reads a pass with 1 of the checks below marked as failing. The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)Unknown — no dataIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range—
Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings estimates not being cutNo analyst estimate revisions are on file for this company yet, so there is nothing to read a trend from.—
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.60
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
— Insufficient inputs (2 of 5 known)FailsOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)−$38.0M · > 0
Unknown — no dataReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%— · ≥ 10.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)Net debt / EBITDA cannot be read over non-positive EBITDA: the ratio flips sign, so a net-cash company prints a healthy-looking positive. Only the Altman Z half, shown beside this line, is measurable, so the test is left unscored rather than counted either way.−41.1×
FailsQuality score ≥ 500.40 · ≥ 50.00
Unknown — no dataRevenue growing over 5 years— · > 0
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 2 of 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Quality Floor is not published separately on the methodology page.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
~ BorderlineA research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context22.2% off its 52-week high
PassesReversal evidence3 of 4 signals fired
Unknown — no dataTrap gate1 of 3 held · 2 no data
Unknown — no dataQuality floor0 of 5 held · 3 no data
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$2.04
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 4 carry no data.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
~ BorderlinePassesTrading above its 50-day average3.25
PassesTrading above its 200-day average2.90
Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)3.25
Fails50-day average sloping up−0.00 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ FailsPasses3-month return in the top half of the universe0.82 · ≥ 0.50
Fails12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.23 · ≥ 0.50
FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.00 · > 0
Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings estimates being revised upNo analyst estimate revisions are on file for this company yet, so there is nothing to read a trend from.—
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
~ BorderlinePassesMACD above its signal line0.02
PassesBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)7.00
PassesHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)higher high · higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)0.95 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: high0.06
Volatility band width: mid-range0.25
Distance from its 52-week high: mid-range0.22
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.