$8.83+0.40 (+4.78%)
Market open · 15-min delayed · as of 2:35 PM ET
PicS N.V. · Tenets
How PICS measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
1 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
1
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
0
within one input of the gate
FAILS
7
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
9
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✓ QualifiesPassesROE ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)139.8% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)100.0% · ≥ 40.0%
Unknown — no dataNet margin ≥ 15%— · ≥ 15.0%
PassesDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)0.00 · ≤ 0.50
Unknown — no dataGrowing FCF (multi-yr)— · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 5 carry no data.Buffett Quality under The screens ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
✕ 3 / 9PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)2.7% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$208.4M · > 0
PassesReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)0.9% → 2.7%
FailsEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$208.4M vs $208.4M
FailsLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)We hold no record of long-term debt as a share of assets for both years for this company, so this signal could not be measured. It still scores 0 under this module's conservative rule (a point is never awarded without evidence), and it is not counted as one of the signals we were able to measure.no
FailsCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)0.20 → 0.19
FailsNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)We hold no record of the diluted share count for both years for this company, so this signal could not be measured. It still scores 0 under this module's conservative rule (a point is never awarded without evidence), and it is not counted as one of the signals we were able to measure.no
FailsGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)100.0% → 100.0%
FailsAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.00 → 0.00
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 3 of 9. 2 of 9 carry no data.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
✕ FailsFailsROIC ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)9.7% · ≥ 15.0%
Unknown — no dataNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×— · ≤ 3.0×
FailsAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)−0.85 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 3 carry no data.Munger Compounders under The screens ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)PassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)$22.9M · > 0
Unknown — no dataEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%— · ≥ 6.0%
Unknown — no dataReturn on capital ≥ 25%— · ≥ 25.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Magic Formula is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
— Insufficient inputs (3 of 7 known)FailsSize: market cap ≥ $2B$899.7M · ≥ $2.0B
FailsCurrent ratio ≥ 2(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)0.19 · ≥ 2.00
PassesPositive EPS 3yWe hold no record of earnings per share for fiscal 2023 and 2024, so those years are judged on the sign of net income to common shareholders, or of net income where we hold no figure for common shareholders.3y
Unknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr— · ≥ 3.0%
Unknown — no dataP/E ≤ 15— · ≤ 15.00
Unknown — no dataP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5— · ≤ 22.50
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 3 of 7 checks below carry data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
Unknown — no dataEPS growth 10–30%— · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)— · 1.0%–8.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout— · ≤ 4.0×
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)— · ≥ 10.00
Unknown — no dataNo dividend cut in the last 5 years—
Unknown — no data5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr— · ≥ 5.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataPayout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 6 checks below carry data.Dividend Growth under The screens ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 5 known)Not scored: see the reason belowReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 yearsOnly 2 of the last 5 fiscal years have return-on-invested-capital on record in our data; 4 are needed to score this criterion, so it is left unscored rather than counted against.1 of 2 on file
Not scored: see the reason belowRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 yearsFive-year revenue history is incomplete in our data, so the compounding rate can't be computed yet.— · ≥ 8.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)Not enough clean diluted-share-count history to measure dilution.— · ≤ 1.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%Free-cash-flow margin isn't derivable yet from the statements we have on file.— · ≥ 12.0%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)1.00 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: no data. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate checkNot enough clean diluted-share-count history to assess buybacks.—
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 5 checks below carry data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
— Insufficient inputs (2 of 6 known)Unknown — no dataOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)— · 8.0%–35.0%
PassesDip within its own normal pullback band0.31
Unknown — no dataNot past where its dips have historically recovered from1.98
Unknown — no dataA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)—
FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure broken · higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 2 of 6 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Drawdown Context is not published separately on the methodology page.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✕ FailsUnknown — no dataA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions— · ≤ 10.00
FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA10.27
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.05 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)1.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 5 carry no data.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)Unknown — no dataIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range—
PassesEarnings estimates not being cut0.08
Unknown — no dataReturns on capital not deteriorating0.10
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✕ FailsPassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)$22.9M · > 0
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)9.7% · ≥ 10.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)We hold no net-debt figure for this company, so only the Altman Z half of this two-part test (the number shown beside this line) could be measured. It is left unscored rather than counted either way.−0.8×
FailsQuality score ≥ 5048.60 · ≥ 50.00
Unknown — no dataRevenue growing over 5 years— · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 5 carry no data.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
— Insufficient inputs (2 of 4 known)A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
Unknown — no dataDrawdown context1 of 6 held · 4 no data
FailsReversal evidence1 of 4 signals fired
Unknown — no dataTrap gate1 of 3 held · 2 no data
FailsQuality floor1 of 5 held · 2 no data
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$10.05
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. No price factors yet: the timing receipts populate after the nightly engine runs.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ FailsFailsTrading above its 50-day average10.76
Unknown — no dataTrading above its 200-day average—
Unknown — no data50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)10.76
Fails50-day average sloping up−0.05 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 4 carry no data.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ FailsFails3-month return in the top half of the universe0.13 · ≥ 0.50
Unknown — no data12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe— · ≥ 0.50
FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.01 · > 0
PassesEarnings estimates being revised up0.08
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ FailsFailsMACD above its signal line−0.67
Not scored: see the reason belowBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)This is a two-part reading (price back above the 50-day, and a bullish momentum cross inside 10 sessions) and a dated momentum cross is not on record for this name yet, so it is left unscored rather than counted either way.—
FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)no higher high · higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.05 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: high0.07
Volatility band width: expanded (wide range)0.88
Distance from its 52-week high—
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.