Pre-market: Oct 1, 2026, 7:53 AM ET· last 1-minute bar
Hyperliquid Strategies Inc. · Tenets
How PURR measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
5 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-01 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 5 known)›
✕FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
—Unknown — no dataYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)0.0% · 1.0%–8.0%
—Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
—Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
—Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout−0.3× · ≤ 4.0×
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 6 known)›
✕FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
—Unknown — no dataAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)— · ≥ 10.00
—Unknown — no dataNo dividend cut in the last 5 years—
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 5 known)›
—Not scored: see the reason belowReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 yearsOnly 1 of the last 5 fiscal years have return-on-invested-capital on record in our data; 4 are needed to score this criterion, so it is left unscored rather than counted against.1 of 1 on file
—Not scored: see the reason belowRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 yearsFive-year revenue history is incomplete in our data, so the compounding rate can't be computed yet.— · ≥ 8.0%
—Not scored: see the reason belowNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)Not enough clean diluted-share-count history to measure dilution.— · ≤ 1.0%
—Not scored: see the reason belowFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%Free-cash-flow margin isn't derivable yet from the statements we have on file.— · ≥ 12.0%
✕FailsEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)−0.06 · ≥ 1.00
—Reading: no data. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate checkNot enough clean diluted-share-count history to assess buybacks.—
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 5 checks below carry data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
✕ Fails›
—Unknown — no dataOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)— · 8.0%–35.0%
✕FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.42
✓PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from−0.90
—Unknown — no dataA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)6.89
✕FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure intact · no higher low
—Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.
The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 3 of 6 carry no data.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
~ Borderline›
✓PassesA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions8.00 · ≤ 10.00
✓PassesReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA10.72
✕FailsPrinted a higher lowno
✕FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.06 · ≥ 1.20
✕FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)2.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.
The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
— Unknown›
—Unknown — no dataIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range—
—Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings estimates not being cutNo analyst estimate revisions are on file for this company yet, so there is nothing to read a trend from.—
—Unknown — no dataReturns on capital not deteriorating0.17
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✓ Qualifies›
✓PassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2026)$500.6M · > 0
✓PassesReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2026)16.7% · ≥ 10.0%
✓PassesA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2026)3.1×
✓PassesQuality score ≥ 5064.60 · ≥ 50.00
—Unknown — no dataRevenue growing over 5 years— · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.
The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 5 carry no data.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
— Insufficient inputs (3 of 4 known)›
A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
✕FailsDrawdown context1 of 6 held · 3 no data
✕FailsReversal evidence2 of 4 signals fired
—Unknown — no dataTrap gate—
✓PassesQuality floor4 of 5 held · 1 no data
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$7.57
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. No price factors yet: the timing receipts populate after the nightly engine runs.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✓ Qualifies›
✓PassesTrading above its 50-day average9.86
✓PassesTrading above its 200-day average6.89
✓Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)9.86
✓Passes50-day average sloping up0.24 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.
The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✓ Qualifies›
✓Passes3-month return in the top half of the universe0.97 · ≥ 0.50
—Unknown — no data12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe— · ≥ 0.50
✓PassesRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving0.01 · > 0
—Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings estimates being revised upNo analyst estimate revisions are on file for this company yet, so there is nothing to read a trend from.—
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.
The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 4 carry no data.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ Fails›
✕FailsMACD above its signal line0.71
✓PassesBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)8.00
✕FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)no higher high · no higher low
✕FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.06 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.
The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scored›
Average daily swing: high0.09
Volatility band width: mid-range0.31
Distance from its 52-week high—
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.