$35.39+0.19 (+0.54%)
At close: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Telephone And Data Systems, Inc. · Statistics
Cheap or expensive, strong or fragile. Every ratio ranked against its sector peers — the number we score — with its own ten-year record shown beside it for context.
VALUE
Cheap vs sector
discount to its peers
QUALITY
Decent
mid-pack profitability
HEALTH
Stable
manageable balance sheet
GROWTH
No data
insufficient peers
In one line
A decent business at a cheap price for its sector: value 67, quality 53, health 62, each a percentile within Technology.
On October 2, 2026 the Tenet Score and these statistics moved from the latest fiscal year to the trailing twelve months, for companies that file quarterly statements. Scores before October 2, 2026 were computed on fiscal-year figures.
Every figure here is from the latest fiscal year. The note under each row says why.track = where peers land, worse → better (direction-adjusted: right always means better)▏sector median● you are here▲ where today's value sits in the company's own 10-year record (context, not scored)hover any metric for its formula
Valuation
67th pctilediscount to its peersEBIT (operating income) for the latest fiscal year ÷ enterprise value on the current market cap (Greenblatt). The vendor's own earnings yield is net income to common ÷ market cap, a different figure.—excluded: no value on file for this company
1.193rd pctileMarket cap at the close of Oct 1, 2026 ÷ book equity, fiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year
Financial health
62nd pctilemanageable balance sheet2.1057th pctileFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year
(Cash, short-term investments and receivables) ÷ current liabilities, as the data vendor builds it. Its receivables include non-trade receivables, which Tenet's balance sheet shows inside other current assets.1.9969th pctileFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year
Total debt less cash and short-term investments, over EBITDA (operating income plus depreciation and amortisation) from the filed statements. Long-term investments are not counted as cash. For some companies they include marketable securities held for more than a year.0.2×51st pctileTenet-derived Total debt less cash and short-term investments, over EBITDA (operating income plus depreciation and amortisation) from the filed statements. Long-term investments are not counted as cash. For some companies they include marketable securities held for more than a year. Computed by Tenet from the filed statements (formula house-nde.v1), because the data vendor published no value for this year.Fiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year
Profitability & returns
53rd pctilemid-pack profitability−3%24th pctileown record too shortFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year
0%29th pctileFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year
—excluded: this year's annual revenue does not match the sum of its four quarters, so figures built on it are not scored
—excluded: this year's annual revenue does not match the sum of its four quarters, so figures built on it are not scored
29.14×98th pctileFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year
Altman's bankruptcy-distance score for the latest fiscal year, with its market-value term at the fiscal year end; higher is safer, as the data vendor publishes it (vendor definition, not reproduced).1.422nd pctileFiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year
Growth
insufficient peersThe yearly rate that compounds the oldest fiscal year's revenue into the latest one, over the true number of fiscal years between them (up to five).—excluded: this year's annual revenue does not match the sum of its four quarters, so figures built on it are not scored
★ Corrected metrics: why we compute these ourselves
the receipts behind the numbers aboveGreenblatt earnings yield—EBIT ÷ EV The vendor's "earningsYield" is NI ÷ market cap, which is not Greenblatt's formula.
ROIC−3%NOPAT ÷ invested capital The vendor's simple ROIC, not its tiny-base roic tag; withheld when a negative EBIT flips its sign.
Interest coverage— Guarded, not faked: we have no interest-expense figure on file for this company, so it's excluded from the ranking instead of rendered as garbage.
Every raw line behind these ratios→
All three statements: 5 years free, 10 on Premium, 20 on Ultimate
Quarterly, in fiscal years: 1 free, 5 on Premium, Unlimited on Ultimate
These percentiles feed the value, income, timing and long-hold tenets→
See which criteria pass, with the live number and the rule behind each
Percentiles computed nightly against 489 Technology peers from our ingested fundamentals DB · raw statements for corrected metrics. Direction-adjusted: for "lower is better" ratios (P/E, D/E…) the percentile is flipped so right always means better. The percentile is the stock's rank among sector peers, the number that is scored. The triangle marks where the current value sits in the company's own ten-year annual record, shown for context and never blended into the score. Computed 2026-10-02 · Not investment advice.