$339.54+3.08 (+0.92%)
At close: Oct 2, 2026, 3:59 PM ET
Texas Pacific Land Corporation · Statistics
Cheap or expensive, strong or fragile. Every ratio ranked against its sector peers — the number we score — with its own ten-year record shown beside it for context.
VALUE
Rich vs sector
premium price vs peers
QUALITY
Decent
mid-pack profitability
HEALTH
Sturdy
conservative balance sheet
GROWTH
Fast
compounding quickly
In one line
A decent business at a rich price for its sector: value 10, quality 74, health 98, growth 82, each a percentile within Energy.
On October 2, 2026 the Tenet Score and these statistics moved from the latest fiscal year to the trailing twelve months, for companies that file quarterly statements. Scores before October 2, 2026 were computed on fiscal-year figures.
Values are the trailing twelve months where a company files quarterly statements and the figure passes our check against the filings, with balance-sheet ratios from the most recent quarter; otherwise, or where a sector's figure is still under review, the latest fiscal year. Piotroski and the five-year growth rates are fiscal years. Each row names its period.track = where peers land, worse → better (direction-adjusted: right always means better)▏sector median● you are here▲ where today's value sits in the company's own ten fiscal years (context, not scored)hover any metric for its formula
Valuation
10th pctilepremium price vs peersEBIT (operating income) for the latest fiscal year ÷ enterprise value on the current market cap (Greenblatt). The vendor's own earnings yield is net income to common ÷ market cap, a different figure.2.6%17th pctileFiscal 2025 EBIT ÷ enterprise value at the close of Oct 1, 2026Fiscal 2025: held in Energy pending the TTM check
42.917th pctilePrice at the close of Oct 1, 2026 ÷ the vendor's trailing-twelve-month EPSLatest fiscal year: held in Energy pending the TTM check
13.94th pctileMarket cap at the close of Oct 1, 2026 ÷ book equity at Jun 30, 2026 (most recent quarter)
Financial health
98th pctileconservative balance sheetMost recent quarter: (Cash, short-term investments and receivables) ÷ current liabilities on the most recent quarter's balance sheet, as the data vendor builds it for that quarter. Its receivables include non-trade receivables, which Tenet's balance sheet shows inside other current assets.4.5098th pctileMost recent quarter, Jun 30, 2026
Total debt less cash and short-term investments, over EBITDA (operating income plus depreciation and amortisation) from the filed statements. Long-term investments are not counted as cash. For some companies they include marketable securities held for more than a year.−0.2×95th pctileown record too shortTenet-derived Total debt less cash and short-term investments, over EBITDA (operating income plus depreciation and amortisation) from the filed statements. Long-term investments are not counted as cash. For some companies they include marketable securities held for more than a year. Computed by Tenet from the filed statements (formula house-nde.v1), because the data vendor published no value for this year.Fiscal 2025 (Dec 31, 2025)Fiscal 2025: held in Energy pending the TTM check
Profitability & returns
74th pctilemid-pack profitabilityTrailing twelve months: Altman's bankruptcy-distance score as Tenet builds it: 1.2 × working capital ÷ total assets, plus 1.4 × retained earnings ÷ total assets, plus 3.3 × EBIT ÷ total assets, plus 0.6 × market cap at the close ÷ total liabilities, plus 1.0 × revenue ÷ total assets. EBIT and revenue are summed over the four most recent quarters and every balance is the most recent quarter's; higher is safer.77.7100th pctileTTM through Jun 30, 2026
Growth
82nd pctilecompounding quicklyThe yearly rate that compounds the oldest fiscal year's revenue into the latest one, over the true number of fiscal years between them (up to five).+21.4%76th pctileFiscal 2020 to fiscal 2025, 5 years: revenue $302.6M to $798.2M
★ Corrected metrics: why we compute these ourselves
the receipts behind the numbers aboveGreenblatt earnings yield2.6%EBIT ÷ EV The vendor's "earningsYield" is NI ÷ market cap, which is not Greenblatt's formula.
ROIC32%NOPAT ÷ invested capital The vendor's simple ROIC, not its tiny-base roic tag; withheld when a negative EBIT flips its sign.
Interest coverage858.2× EBIT ÷ interest expense, ranked within sector peers.
Every raw line behind these ratios→
All three statements: 5 years free, 10 on Premium, 20 on Ultimate
Quarterly, in fiscal years: 1 free, 5 on Premium, Unlimited on Ultimate
These percentiles feed the value, income, timing and long-hold tenets→
See which criteria pass, with the live number and the rule behind each
Percentiles computed nightly against 127 Energy peers from our ingested fundamentals DB · raw statements for corrected metrics. Direction-adjusted: for "lower is better" ratios (P/E, D/E…) the percentile is flipped so right always means better. The percentile is the stock's rank among sector peers, the number that is scored. The triangle marks where the current value (the trailing twelve months or the latest fiscal year, as its row names) sits in the company's own ten fiscal-year record, shown for context and never blended into the score. Computed 2026-10-02 · Not investment advice.