How AKTS measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
0 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
0
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
0
within one input of the gate
FAILS
9
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
8
insufficient data to judge
✓passes·✕fails·~borderline·—unknown
Growth receipts arrive in a coming release
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
— Insufficient inputs (2 of 5 known)›
—Unknown — no dataROE ≥ 15%— · ≥ 15.0%
✓PassesGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: a quarter is missing from the last four)100.0% · ≥ 40.0%
—Unknown — no dataNet margin ≥ 15%— · ≥ 15.0%
—Unknown — no dataDebt/equity ≤ 0.5— · ≤ 0.50
✕FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)Free cash flow was negative in fiscal 2025.no · > 0
—Unknown — no dataReturn on capital ≥ 25%— · ≥ 25.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Magic Formula is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
✕ Fails›
✕FailsSize: market cap ≥ $2B$1.0B · ≥ $2.0B
✓PassesCurrent ratio ≥ 2(fiscal 2025: a quarter is missing from the last four)7.37 · ≥ 2.00
✕FailsPositive EPS 4y0y
✕FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
—Unknown — no dataEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr— · ≥ 3.0%
—Unknown — no dataP/E ≤ 15— · ≤ 15.00
—Unknown — no dataP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5— · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.
The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 3 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 5 known)›
✕FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
—Unknown — no dataYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)0.0% · 1.0%–8.0%
—Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
—Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
—Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout— · ≤ 4.0×
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 6 known)›
✕FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
—Unknown — no dataAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)— · ≥ 10.00
—Unknown — no dataNo dividend cut in the last 5 years—
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
✕ Fails›
✕FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years0 of 4 on file
—Not scored: see the reason belowRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 yearsFive-year revenue history is incomplete in our data, so the compounding rate can't be computed yet.— · ≥ 8.0%
—Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)A loss year makes cash-vs-earnings unreadable: the ratio inverts over negative net income, so it is not scored (never counted against).— · ≥ 1.00
✕Reading: does not hold. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check14.6%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.
The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 5 carry no data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
✕ Fails›
—Unknown — no dataOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)— · 8.0%–35.0%
✕FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.32
✕FailsNot past where its dips have historically recovered from1.71
—Unknown — no dataA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)—
✕FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure broken · higher low
—Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.
The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 3 of 6 carry no data.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✕ Fails›
—Unknown — no dataA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions— · ≤ 10.00
✕FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA22.94
✓PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
✕FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)0.82 · ≥ 1.20
✕FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)1.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.
The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 5 carry no data.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
✕ Fails›
—Unknown — no dataIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range—
✕FailsEarnings estimates not being cut−0.10
✕FailsReturns on capital not deteriorating−0.32
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.
The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 3 carry no data.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✕ Fails›
✕FailsOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: a quarter is missing from the last four)−$63.7M · > 0
✕FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2025: a quarter is missing from the last four)−31.8% · ≥ 10.0%
—Not scored: see the reason belowA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)Neither half of this two-part test is derivable from the statements we have on file, so it is left unscored.—
✓PassesQuality score ≥ 5059.20 · ≥ 50.00
—Unknown — no dataRevenue growing over 5 years— · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.
The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 5 carry no data.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
— Insufficient inputs (4 of 4 known)›
A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
✕FailsDrawdown context0 of 6 held · 3 no data
✕FailsReversal evidence1 of 4 signals fired
✕FailsTrap gate0 of 3 held · 1 no data
✕FailsQuality floor1 of 5 held · 2 no data
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$22.07
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. No price factors yet: the timing receipts populate after the nightly engine runs.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ Fails›
✕FailsTrading above its 50-day average23.49
—Unknown — no dataTrading above its 200-day average—
—Unknown — no data50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)23.49
✕Fails50-day average sloping up−0.09 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.
The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 4 carry no data.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ Fails›
✕Fails3-month return in the top half of the universe0.03 · ≥ 0.50
—Unknown — no data12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe— · ≥ 0.50
✕FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.00 · > 0
✕FailsEarnings estimates being revised up−0.10
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.
The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ Fails›
✕FailsMACD above its signal line−1.53
—Not scored: see the reason belowBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)This is a two-part reading (price back above the 50-day, and a bullish momentum cross inside 10 sessions) and a dated momentum cross is not on record for this name yet, so it is left unscored rather than counted either way.—
✕FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)no higher high · higher low
✕FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)0.82 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.
The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scored›
Average daily swing: high0.07
Volatility band width: expanded (wide range)0.91
Distance from its 52-week high—
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.