$27.03−0.10 (−0.37%)
At close: Oct 26, 2026, 4:00 PM ET· Nasdaq · USD
Ceribell (CBLL) Stock Checks
How CBLL measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
Sources Company filings and computed by Tenet Filings and TenetScreens as of How we compute thisNot investment advice
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
4 / 17 qualify todayas of Oct 27, 2026 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
4
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
2
within one input of the gate
FAILS
4
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
7
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✕ FailsFailsROE ≥ 15%(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)−43.9% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesGross margin ≥ 40%(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)88.9% · ≥ 40.0%
FailsNet margin ≥ 15%(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)−64.7% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(quarter ending Jun 30, 2026)0.16 · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)Free cash flow was negative in fiscal 2025.no · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Buffett Quality under The screens ›Today's Buffett Quality list ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
✕ 3 / 9FailsReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)−27.3% · > 0
FailsOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)−$40.8M · > 0
FailsReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)−17.9% → −27.3%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)−$40.8M vs −$53.4M
FailsLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)8.7% → 10.1%
FailsCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)16.73 → 9.73
FailsNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)+205.8%
PassesGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)86.7% → 87.9%
PassesAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.29 → 0.45
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 3 of 9.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›Today's Piotroski F-Score list ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)Unknown — no dataROIC ≥ 15%— · ≥ 15.0%
Unknown — no dataNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×— · ≤ 3.0×
PassesAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)14.27 · ≥ 3.00
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data.Munger Compounders under The screens ›Today's Munger Compounders list ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)FailsEBIT > 0(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)−$70.0M · > 0
Unknown — no dataEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%— · ≥ 6.0%
Unknown — no dataReturn on capital ≥ 25%— · ≥ 25.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Magic Formula is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›Today's Magic Formula® list ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
✕ FailsFailsSize: market cap ≥ $2B$1.0B · ≥ $2.0B
PassesCurrent ratio ≥ 2(quarter ending Jun 30, 2026)9.18 · ≥ 2.00
FailsPositive EPS 3y0y
FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
Unknown — no dataEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr— · ≥ 3.0%
Unknown — no dataP/E ≤ 15— · ≤ 15.00
Unknown — no dataP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5— · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 3 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›Today's Graham Defensive list ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
Unknown — no dataEPS growth 10–30%— · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›Today's Lynch GARP list ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 5 known)FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
Unknown — no dataYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)0.0% · 1.0%–8.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout— · ≤ 4.0×
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 6 known)FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
Unknown — no dataAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)— · ≥ 10.00
Unknown — no dataNo dividend cut in the last 5 years—
Unknown — no data5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr— · ≥ 5.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataPayout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 6 checks below carry data.Dividend Growth under The screens ›Today's Dividend Growth list ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
— Insufficient inputs (2 of 5 known)FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years1 of 3 on file
Not scored: see the reason belowRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 yearsFive-year revenue history is incomplete in our data, so the compounding rate can't be computed yet.— · ≥ 8.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)Not enough clean diluted-share-count history to measure dilution.— · ≤ 1.0%
FailsFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%−46.7% · ≥ 12.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)Cash-flow-to-earnings quality isn't available in our data for this period.— · ≥ 1.00
Reading: no data. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate checkNot enough clean diluted-share-count history to assess buybacks.—
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 2 of 5 checks below carry data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›Today's Quality Compounder list ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
~ BorderlineFailsOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)3.8% · 8.0%–35.0%
PassesDip within its own normal pullback band0.11
PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from0.14
PassesA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)20.70
PassesHigher-low structure still intactstructure intact · higher low
PassesClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)14.00 · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✓ QualifiesPassesA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions9.00 · ≤ 10.00
PassesReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA24.36
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
PassesA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.23 · ≥ 1.20
PassesReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)4.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)Unknown — no dataIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range—
Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings estimates not being cutThe 90-day estimate-revision window is still filling (11 days on record so far). The reading beside this line is real, but a window this short can reverse, so it is shown rather than scored.−0.00
FailsReturns on capital not deteriorating−0.23
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✕ FailsFailsOperating profit is positive(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)−$70.0M · > 0
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)−47.2% · ≥ 10.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)Net debt / EBITDA cannot be read over non-positive EBITDA: the ratio flips sign, so a net-cash company prints a healthy-looking positive. Only the Altman Z half, shown beside this line, is measurable, so the test is left unscored rather than counted either way.14.3×
FailsQuality score ≥ 5040.30 · ≥ 50.00
Unknown — no dataRevenue growing over 5 years— · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 5 carry no data.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
~ BorderlineA research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context3.8% off its 52-week high
PassesReversal evidence4 of 4 signals fired
Unknown — no dataTrap gate0 of 3 held · 2 no data
FailsQuality floor0 of 5 held · 2 no data
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$23.15
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 4 carry no data.Qualified Dip under The screens ›Today's Qualified Dip list ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✓ QualifiesPassesTrading above its 50-day average24.70
PassesTrading above its 200-day average20.70
Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)24.70
Passes50-day average sloping up0.12 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✓ QualifiesPasses3-month return in the top half of the universe0.98 · ≥ 0.50
Passes12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.92 · ≥ 0.50
PassesRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving0.00 · > 0
Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings estimates being revised upThe 90-day estimate-revision window is still filling (11 days on record so far). The reading beside this line is real, but a window this short can reverse, so it is shown rather than scored.−0.00
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✓ QualifiesPassesMACD above its signal line0.90
PassesBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)9.00
PassesHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)higher high · higher low
PassesA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.23 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: elevated0.05
Volatility band width: mid-range0.72
Distance from its 52-week high: at / near its highs0.04
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Common questions
How many investing rule sets does Ceribell pass?
Ceribell qualifies on 4 of 17 rule sets as of 2026-10-27, with 2 borderline and 4 failing.
Does Ceribell meet the Graham Defensive criteria?
Ceribell fails the Graham Defensive rule set as of 2026-10-27.
Does Ceribell meet the Buffett Quality criteria?
Ceribell fails the Buffett Quality rule set as of 2026-10-27.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.