$3.13−0.38 (−10.73%)
At close: Oct 26, 2026, 4:00 PM ET· NYSE · USD
Cia Energetica De Minas Gerais (CIG-C) Stock Checks
How CIG-C measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
Sources Company filings and computed by Tenet Filings and TenetScreens as of How we compute thisNot investment advice
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
3 / 17 qualify todayas of Oct 27, 2026 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
3
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
5
within one input of the gate
FAILS
8
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
1
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✕ FailsPassesROE ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)37.9% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)16.5% · ≥ 40.0%
FailsNet margin ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)11.2% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)1.42 · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−11.9% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Buffett Quality under The screens ›Today's Buffett Quality list ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
✕ 4 / 9PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)7.3% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$847.7M · > 0
FailsReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)11.9% → 7.3%
FailsEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$847.7M vs $894.5M
FailsLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)20.6% → 29.0%
PassesCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)1.45 → 1.59
PassesNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)+0.0%
FailsGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)18.4% → 16.5%
FailsAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.74 → 0.65
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 4 of 9.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›Today's Piotroski F-Score list ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
~ BorderlinePassesROIC ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)19.1% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)1.9× · ≤ 3.0×
FailsAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)1.47 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Munger Compounders under The screens ›Today's Munger Compounders list ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
✓ QualifiesPassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)$1.4B · > 0
Unknown — no dataEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%— · ≥ 6.0%
PassesReturn on capital ≥ 25%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)622.8% · ≥ 25.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Magic Formula.The pass rule for Magic Formula is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 3 carry no data.About this screen ›Today's Magic Formula® list ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
~ BorderlinePassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$5.5B · ≥ $2.0B
FailsCurrent ratio ≥ 2(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)1.59 · ≥ 2.00
PassesPositive EPS 10yWe hold no record of earnings per share for fiscal 2016, so that year is judged on the sign of net income to common shareholders.10y
PassesPays a dividend$0.19 · > 0
FailsEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−14.4% per year · ≥ 3.0%
Unknown — no dataP/E ≤ 15— · ≤ 15.00
Unknown — no dataP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5— · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›Today's Graham Defensive list ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 2 known)Unknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
FailsEPS growth 10–30%(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−14.4% per year · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›Today's Lynch GARP list ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
~ BorderlinePassesPays a dividend$0.19 · > 0
PassesYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)3.2% · 1.0%–8.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
PassesBalance sheet can sustain the payout1.9× · ≤ 4.0×
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)2.00 · ≥ 10.00
FailsNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsLast cut 2023
Passes5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr35.6% · ≥ 5.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety.The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 8 carry no data.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
✕ FailsPassesPays a dividend$0.19 · > 0
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)2.00 · ≥ 10.00
FailsNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsLast cut 2023
Passes5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr35.6% · ≥ 5.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataPayout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Dividend Growth.The pass rule for Dividend Growth is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 6 carry no data.Dividend Growth under The screens ›Today's Dividend Growth list ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
✕ FailsPassesReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years4 of 4 on file
PassesRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years8.0% per year · ≥ 8.0%
FailsNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)28.6% · ≤ 1.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%Free-cash-flow margin isn't derivable yet from the statements we have on file.— · ≥ 12.0%
FailsEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)0.95 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: does not hold. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check28.6%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 5 carry no data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›Today's Quality Compounder list ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
✕ FailsPassesOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)22.4% · 8.0%–35.0%
FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.19
PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from1.03
FailsA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)3.13
FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure broken · higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 6 carry no data.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✕ FailsFailsA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions13.00 · ≤ 10.00
FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA3.30
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.02 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)1.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
✓ QualifiesUnknown — no dataIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range—
PassesEarnings estimates not being cut0.07
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.19
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 3 carry no data.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
~ BorderlinePassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)$1.4B · > 0
PassesReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)19.1% · ≥ 10.0%
FailsA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)1.5×
FailsQuality score ≥ 5047.60 · ≥ 50.00
PassesRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2020 to 2025)8.0% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
~ BorderlineA research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context22.4% off its 52-week high
FailsReversal evidence1 of 4 signals fired
PassesTrap gate2 of 3 held · 1 no data
FailsQuality floor3 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$3.15
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Qualified Dip under The screens ›Today's Qualified Dip list ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ FailsFailsTrading above its 50-day average3.22
FailsTrading above its 200-day average3.13
Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)3.22
Passes50-day average sloping up0.03 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✓ QualifiesPasses3-month return in the top half of the universe0.55 · ≥ 0.50
Passes12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.71 · ≥ 0.50
PassesRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving0.00 · > 0
PassesEarnings estimates being revised up0.07
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ FailsFailsMACD above its signal line0.04
FailsBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)13.00
PassesHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)higher high · higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.02 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: high0.05
Volatility band width: expanded (wide range)0.82
Distance from its 52-week high: mid-range0.22
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Common questions
How many investing rule sets does Cia Energetica De Minas Gerais pass?
Cia Energetica De Minas Gerais qualifies on 3 of 17 rule sets as of 2026-10-27, with 5 borderline and 8 failing.
Does Cia Energetica De Minas Gerais meet the Graham Defensive criteria?
Cia Energetica De Minas Gerais is borderline on the Graham Defensive rule set as of 2026-10-27.
Does Cia Energetica De Minas Gerais meet the Buffett Quality criteria?
Cia Energetica De Minas Gerais fails the Buffett Quality rule set as of 2026-10-27.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.