$176.49+0.96 (+0.55%)
At close: Oct 1, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Digital Realty Trust Inc · Tenets
How DLR measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
0 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
0
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
8
within one input of the gate
FAILS
8
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
1
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
~ BorderlineFailsROE ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)5.5% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)100.0% · ≥ 40.0%
PassesNet margin ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)21.5% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)0.74 · ≤ 0.50
PassesGrowing FCF (multi-yr)(fiscal 2020 to 2025)7.2% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Buffett Quality under The screens ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
✕ 5 / 9PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)2.7% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$2.4B · > 0
PassesReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)1.3% → 2.7%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$2.4B vs $1.3B
FailsLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)36.9% → 37.2%
FailsCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)2.07 → 1.59
FailsNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)+4.9%
FailsGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)The reported cost of revenue collapses to a level implying a 100% gross margin, which we treat as a data artefact rather than a real margin, so gross margin could not be measured. It still scores 0 under this module's conservative rule (a point is never awarded without evidence), and it is not counted as one of the signals we were able to measure.no
PassesAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.12 → 0.12
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 5 of 9. 1 of 9 carry no data.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
✕ FailsFailsROIC ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.5% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)5.8× · ≤ 3.0×
FailsAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.33 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Munger Compounders under The screens ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
~ BorderlinePassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)$658.5M · > 0
FailsEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)0.8% · ≥ 6.0%
PassesReturn on capital ≥ 25%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)37.0% · ≥ 25.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Magic Formula.The pass rule for Magic Formula is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
~ BorderlinePassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$65.3B · ≥ $2.0B
FailsCurrent ratio ≥ 2(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.59 · ≥ 2.00
PassesPositive EPS 10y10y
PassesPays a dividend$4.88 · > 0
PassesEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr(fiscal 2020 to 2025)29.1% per year · ≥ 3.0%
Unknown — no dataP/E ≤ 15— · ≤ 15.00
Unknown — no dataP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5— · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 2 known)Unknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
PassesEPS growth 10–30%(fiscal 2020 to 2025)29.1% per year · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
✕ FailsPassesPays a dividend$4.88 · > 0
PassesYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)2.8% · 1.0%–8.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
PassesEarnings payout not stretched (FFO approx)53.7% · ≤ 85.0%
FailsBalance sheet can sustain the payout5.8× · ≤ 4.0×
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)0.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsNo cut on record
Fails5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr1.7% · ≥ 5.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety.The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 8 carry no data.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
~ BorderlinePassesPays a dividend$4.88 · > 0
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)0.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsNo cut on record
Fails5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr1.7% · ≥ 5.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
PassesPayout not stretched (FFO approx)53.7% · ≤ 85.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Dividend Growth.The pass rule for Dividend Growth is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 6 carry no data.Dividend Growth under The screens ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
✕ FailsFailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years0 of 4 on file
PassesRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years9.4% per year · ≥ 8.0%
FailsNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)8.8% · ≤ 1.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%Free-cash-flow margin isn't derivable yet from the statements we have on file.— · ≥ 12.0%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)1.84 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: does not hold. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check8.8%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 5 carry no data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
~ BorderlinePassesOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)15.2% · 8.0%–35.0%
PassesDip within its own normal pullback band0.14
PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from0.88
FailsA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)180.93
FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure intact · no higher low
PassesClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)34.00 · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✕ FailsUnknown — no dataA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions— · ≤ 10.00
FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA184.97
FailsPrinted a higher lowno
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.02 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)0.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 5 carry no data.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
~ BorderlineFailsIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range(through fiscal 2025)1.0×
PassesEarnings estimates not being cut0.32
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.02
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
~ BorderlinePassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)$658.5M · > 0
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.5% · ≥ 10.0%
FailsA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.3×
PassesQuality score ≥ 5052.10 · ≥ 50.00
PassesRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2020 to 2025)9.4% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
~ BorderlineA research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context15.2% off its 52-week high
FailsReversal evidence0 of 4 signals fired
FailsTrap gate2 of 3 held
FailsQuality floor3 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$173.11
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ FailsFailsTrading above its 50-day average188.18
FailsTrading above its 200-day average180.93
Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)188.18
Passes50-day average sloping up0.01 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ FailsPasses3-month return in the top half of the universe0.69 · ≥ 0.50
Fails12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.46 · ≥ 0.50
FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.00 · > 0
PassesEarnings estimates being revised up0.32
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ FailsFailsMACD above its signal line−3.09
Not scored: see the reason belowBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)This is a two-part reading (price back above the 50-day, and a bullish momentum cross inside 10 sessions) and a dated momentum cross is not on record for this name yet, so it is left unscored rather than counted either way.—
FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)higher high · no higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.02 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: normal0.03
Volatility band width: mid-range0.62
Distance from its 52-week high: mid-range0.15
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.