How FDXF measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
0 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 4 of 9.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›
The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
— Unknown›
—Unknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
—Unknown — no dataYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)— · 1.0%–8.0%
—Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
—Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
—Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout4.3× · ≤ 4.0×
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
— Unknown›
—Unknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
—Unknown — no dataAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)— · ≥ 10.00
—Unknown — no dataNo dividend cut in the last 5 years—
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
✕ Fails›
—Not scored: see the reason belowReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 yearsOnly 2 of the last 5 fiscal years have return-on-invested-capital on record in our data; 4 are needed to score this criterion, so it is left unscored rather than counted against.1 of 2 on file
✕FailsRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years−4.5% per year · ≥ 8.0%
✕FailsEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)0.25 · ≥ 1.00
✕Reading: does not hold. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check0.1%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.
The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 5 carry no data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 6 known)›
—Unknown — no dataOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)— · 8.0%–35.0%
✕FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.43
—Unknown — no dataNot past where its dips have historically recovered from2.00
—Unknown — no dataA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)—
—Unknown — no dataHigher-low structure still intact—
—Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 6 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Drawdown Context is not published separately on the methodology page.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✕ Fails›
✕FailsA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions13.00 · ≤ 10.00
✕FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA130.82
—Unknown — no dataPrinted a higher low—
✕FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)0.92 · ≥ 1.20
✕FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)0.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.
The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 5 carry no data.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)›
—Unknown — no dataIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range—
✕FailsEarnings estimates not being cut−0.02
—Unknown — no dataReturns on capital not deteriorating0.07
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✕ Fails›
✓PassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2026: files no quarterly statements)$540.0M · > 0
✕FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2026: files no quarterly statements)7.0% · ≥ 10.0%
✕FailsA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2026: files no quarterly statements)3.5×
✕FailsQuality score ≥ 5034.80 · ≥ 50.00
✕FailsRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2023 to 2026)−4.5% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.
The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
— Insufficient inputs (2 of 4 known)›
A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
—Unknown — no dataDrawdown context0 of 6 held · 5 no data
✕FailsReversal evidence0 of 4 signals fired
—Unknown — no dataTrap gate0 of 3 held · 2 no data
✕FailsQuality floor1 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$149.53
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. No price factors yet: the timing receipts populate after the nightly engine runs.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ Fails›
✕FailsTrading above its 50-day average132.57
—Unknown — no dataTrading above its 200-day average—
—Unknown — no data50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)132.57
✕Fails50-day average sloping up−0.09 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.
The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 4 carry no data.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ Fails›
✕Fails3-month return in the top half of the universe0.11 · ≥ 0.50
—Unknown — no data12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe— · ≥ 0.50
✕FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.01 · > 0
✕FailsEarnings estimates being revised up−0.02
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.
The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ Fails›
✕FailsMACD above its signal line−6.40
✕FailsBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)13.00
—Unknown — no dataHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)—
✕FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)0.92 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.
The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scored›
Average daily swing: elevated0.04
Volatility band width: expanded (wide range)0.81
Distance from its 52-week high—
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.