$91.60−0.80 (−0.87%)
At close: Oct 1, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Liberty Media Corp. · Tenets
How FWONK measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
0 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
0
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
6
within one input of the gate
FAILS
8
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
3
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✕ FailsFailsROE ≥ 15%(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)5.4% · ≥ 15.0%
Unknown — no dataGross margin ≥ 40%— · ≥ 40.0%
FailsNet margin ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)12.4% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(quarter ending Jun 30, 2026)0.59 · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−9.2% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 5 carry no data.Buffett Quality under The screens ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
~ 6 / 9PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)3.6% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$908.0M · > 0
PassesReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)−19.0% → 3.6%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$908.0M vs $555.0M
FailsLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)22.8% → 32.8%
FailsCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)2.95 → 1.46
PassesNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)−26.6%
FailsGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)The reported cost of revenue collapses to a level implying a 100% gross margin, which we treat as a data artefact rather than a real margin, so gross margin could not be measured. It still scores 0 under this module's conservative rule (a point is never awarded without evidence), and it is not counted as one of the signals we were able to measure.no
PassesAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.28 → 0.29
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 6 of 9. 1 of 9 carry no data.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
✕ FailsFailsROIC ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)3.6% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)4.2× · ≤ 3.0×
PassesAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)3.82 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Munger Compounders under The screens ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
~ BorderlinePassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)$577.0M · > 0
FailsEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)2.3% · ≥ 6.0%
PassesReturn on capital ≥ 25%(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)44.3% · ≥ 25.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Magic Formula.The pass rule for Magic Formula is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
✕ FailsPassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$21.0B · ≥ $2.0B
FailsCurrent ratio ≥ 2(quarter ending Jun 30, 2026)1.27 · ≥ 2.00
FailsPositive EPS 10yWe hold no record of earnings per share for fiscal 2017, so that year is judged on the sign of net income to common shareholders, or of net income where we hold no figure for common shareholders.7y
Unknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr— · ≥ 3.0%
FailsP/E ≤ 15(latest fiscal year: the share count moved too much across the four quarters)41.34 · ≤ 15.00
FailsP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5113.84 · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
Unknown — no dataEPS growth 10–30%— · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)— · 1.0%–8.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout4.2× · ≤ 4.0×
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPays a dividend— · > 0
Unknown — no dataAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)— · ≥ 10.00
Unknown — no dataNo dividend cut in the last 5 years—
Unknown — no data5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr— · ≥ 5.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataPayout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 6 checks below carry data.Dividend Growth under The screens ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
~ BorderlineFailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years0 of 5
FailsRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years−13.7% per year · ≥ 8.0%
PassesNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)−13.5% · ≤ 1.0%
PassesFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%19.0% · ≥ 12.0%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)2.34 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: holds. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check−13.5%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
✕ FailsPassesOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)16.2% · 8.0%–35.0%
FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.16
FailsNot past where its dips have historically recovered from1.42
FailsA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)92.23
FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure broken · higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 6 carry no data.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
~ BorderlinePassesA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions3.00 · ≤ 10.00
FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA96.59
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)0.97 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)2.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
~ BorderlineFailsIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range(through fiscal 2025)0.7×
PassesEarnings estimates not being cut0.01
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.04
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✕ FailsPassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)$577.0M · > 0
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)3.6% · ≥ 10.0%
FailsA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2025: held in its sector pending the TTM check)3.8×
PassesQuality score ≥ 5063.40 · ≥ 50.00
FailsRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−13.7% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
~ BorderlineA research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context16.2% off its 52-week high
FailsReversal evidence2 of 4 signals fired
FailsTrap gate2 of 3 held
FailsQuality floor2 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$96.05
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ FailsFailsTrading above its 50-day average98.57
FailsTrading above its 200-day average92.23
Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)98.57
Fails50-day average sloping up−0.01 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ FailsFails3-month return in the top half of the universe0.48 · ≥ 0.50
Fails12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.30 · ≥ 0.50
FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.00 · > 0
PassesEarnings estimates being revised up0.01
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ FailsFailsMACD above its signal line−1.67
FailsBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)3.00
PassesHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)higher high · higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)0.97 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: normal0.03
Volatility band width: squeezed (compressed range)0.01
Distance from its 52-week high: mid-range0.16
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.