$83.27−0.69 (−0.82%)
At close: Oct 26, 2026, 4:00 PM ET· NYSE · USD
Lennar (LEN-B) Stock Checks
How LEN-B measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
Sources Company filings and computed by Tenet Filings and TenetScreens as of How we compute thisNot investment advice
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
1 / 17 qualify todayas of Oct 27, 2026 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
1
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
8
within one input of the gate
FAILS
8
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
0
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✕ FailsFailsROE ≥ 15%(TTM through Aug 31, 2026)6.0% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)9.9% · ≥ 40.0%
FailsNet margin ≥ 15%(TTM through Aug 31, 2026)4.1% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(quarter ending Aug 31, 2026)0.40 · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−63.1% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Buffett Quality under The screens ›Today's Buffett Quality list ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
~ 6 / 9PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)6.1% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$216.8M · > 0
PassesReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)4.8% → 6.1%
FailsEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$216.8M vs $2.1B
PassesLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)10.1% → 0.0%
FailsCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)We hold no record of the current ratio for both years for this company, so this signal could not be measured. It still scores 0 under this module's conservative rule (a point is never awarded without evidence), and it is not counted as one of the signals we were able to measure.29.31 → n/a
PassesNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)−7.0%
FailsGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)15.5% → 9.9%
PassesAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.43 → 0.99
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 6 of 9. 1 of 9 carry no data.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›Today's Piotroski F-Score list ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
✕ FailsFailsROIC ≥ 15%(TTM through Aug 31, 2026)4.2% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)−1.3× · ≤ 3.0×
FailsAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(TTM through Aug 31, 2026)2.33 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Munger Compounders under The screens ›Today's Munger Compounders list ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
✓ QualifiesPassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)$2.7B · > 0
PassesEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)16.3% · ≥ 6.0%
Unknown — no dataReturn on capital ≥ 25%— · ≥ 25.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Magic Formula.The pass rule for Magic Formula is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 3 carry no data.About this screen ›Today's Magic Formula® list ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
~ BorderlinePassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$20.0B · ≥ $2.0B
PassesCurrent ratio ≥ 2(quarter ending Aug 31, 2026)24.93 · ≥ 2.00
PassesPositive EPS 10y10y
PassesPays a dividend$2.00 · > 0
FailsEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr(fiscal 2020 to 2025)1.4% per year · ≥ 3.0%
FailsP/E ≤ 15(TTM through Aug 31, 2026)15.47 · ≤ 15.00
PassesP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5(TTM through Aug 31, 2026)14.33 · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Graham Defensive under The screens ›Today's Graham Defensive list ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
✕ FailsFailsPEG < 1 (hist. growth)(P/E TTM through Aug 31, 2026, EPS growth through fiscal 2025)11.07 · < 1.00
FailsEPS growth 10–30%(fiscal 2020 to 2025)1.4% per year · 10.0%–30.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Lynch GARP.The pass rule for Lynch GARP is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Lynch GARP under The screens ›Today's Lynch GARP list ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
~ BorderlinePassesPays a dividend$2.00 · > 0
PassesYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)2.4% · 1.0%–8.0%
FailsCovered by free cash flow0.05 · ≥ 1.20
PassesEarnings payout not stretched25.7% · ≤ 75.0%
PassesBalance sheet can sustain the payout−1.3× · ≤ 4.0×
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)0.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsLast cut 2008
Passes5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr14.9% · ≥ 5.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety.The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
~ BorderlinePassesPays a dividend$2.00 · > 0
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)0.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsLast cut 2008
Passes5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr14.9% · ≥ 5.0%
FailsCovered by free cash flow0.05 · ≥ 1.20
PassesPayout not stretched25.7% · ≤ 75.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Dividend Growth.The pass rule for Dividend Growth is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Dividend Growth under The screens ›Today's Dividend Growth list ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
✕ FailsFailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years2 of 5
PassesRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years8.7% per year · ≥ 8.0%
PassesNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)−4.0% · ≤ 1.0%
FailsFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%0.1% · ≥ 12.0%
FailsEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)0.71 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: holds. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check−4.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›Today's Quality Compounder list ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
✕ FailsPassesOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)33.6% · 8.0%–35.0%
FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.13
PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from−0.21
FailsA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)88.70
FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure intact · no higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 6 carry no data.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
~ BorderlinePassesA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions5.00 · ≤ 10.00
PassesReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA79.82
FailsPrinted a higher lowno
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.07 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)2.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
~ BorderlinePassesIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range(through fiscal 2025)0.5×
FailsEarnings estimates not being cut−0.12
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.09
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
~ BorderlinePassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)$2.7B · > 0
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(TTM through Aug 31, 2026)4.2% · ≥ 10.0%
PassesA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(TTM through Aug 31, 2026)2.3×
FailsQuality score ≥ 5025.40 · ≥ 50.00
PassesRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2020 to 2025)8.7% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
~ BorderlineA research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context33.6% off its 52-week high
FailsReversal evidence2 of 4 signals fired
FailsTrap gate2 of 3 held
FailsQuality floor3 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$74.71
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Qualified Dip under The screens ›Today's Qualified Dip list ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ FailsPassesTrading above its 50-day average79.96
FailsTrading above its 200-day average88.70
Fails50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)79.96
Fails50-day average sloping up−0.03 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ FailsPasses3-month return in the top half of the universe0.56 · ≥ 0.50
Fails12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.14 · ≥ 0.50
FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.00 · > 0
FailsEarnings estimates being revised up−0.12
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ FailsPassesMACD above its signal line0.54
PassesBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)5.00
FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)no higher high · no higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.07 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: elevated0.04
Volatility band width: mid-range0.76
Distance from its 52-week high: a deep pullback0.34
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Common questions
How many investing rule sets does Lennar pass?
Lennar qualifies on 1 of 17 rule sets as of 2026-10-27, with 8 borderline and 8 failing.
Does Lennar meet the Graham Defensive criteria?
Lennar is borderline on the Graham Defensive rule set as of 2026-10-27.
Does Lennar meet the Buffett Quality criteria?
Lennar fails the Buffett Quality rule set as of 2026-10-27.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.