⌕
McGraw Hill Inc · MH · NYSE
Tenet 50 · Mixed
⇄ Compare
$12.90−0.16 (−1.23%)
At close: Oct 2, 2026, 12:32 PM ET

McGraw Hill Inc · Tenets

How MH measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.

The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).

1 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
1
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
7
within one input of the gate
FAILS
6
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
3
insufficient data to judge
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✕ Fails
FailsROE ≥ 15%(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)7.0% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)80.9% · ≥ 40.0%
FailsNet margin ≥ 15%(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.7% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)3.54 · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)(fiscal 2021 to 2026)−3.0% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.
The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Buffett Quality under The screens ›
PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2026)0.6% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2026)$331.2M · > 0
PassesReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2026)−1.5% → 0.6%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2026)$331.2M vs $35.3M
PassesLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2026)55.0% → 46.7%
FailsCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2026)0.79 → 0.77
FailsNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2026)+10.2%
PassesGross margin expanding(fiscal 2026)79.9% → 80.9%
PassesAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2026)0.36 → 0.38
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.
The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 7 of 9.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›
FailsROIC ≥ 15%(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)6.8% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)3.1× · ≤ 3.0×
FailsAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)0.49 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.
The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Munger Compounders under The screens ›
PassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)$276.8M · > 0
FailsEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)5.7% · ≥ 6.0%
Unknown — no dataReturn on capital ≥ 25%— · ≥ 25.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Magic Formula.
The pass rule for Magic Formula is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 3 carry no data.About this screen ›
PassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$2.5B · ≥ $2.0B
FailsCurrent ratio ≥ 2(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)0.77 · ≥ 2.00
FailsPositive EPS 10y2y
FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
Unknown — no dataEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr— · ≥ 3.0%
FailsP/E ≤ 15(latest fiscal year: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)67.91 · ≤ 15.00
FailsP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5233.65 · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.
The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Unknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
Unknown — no dataEPS growth 10–30%— · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›
FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
Unknown — no dataYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)0.0% · 1.0%–8.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout3.1× · ≤ 4.0×
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 5 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is not published separately on the methodology page.
FailsPays a dividend$0.00 · > 0
Unknown — no dataAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)— · ≥ 10.00
Unknown — no dataNo dividend cut in the last 5 years—
Unknown — no data5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr— · ≥ 5.0%
Unknown — no dataCovered by free cash flow— · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataPayout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 6 checks below carry data.Dividend Growth under The screens ›
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years0 of 4 on file
FailsRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years6.4% per year · ≥ 8.0%
FailsNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)58.7% · ≤ 1.0%
FailsFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%11.7% · ≥ 12.0%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)9.38 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: does not hold. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check58.7%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.
The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
PassesOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)27.4% · 8.0%–35.0%
PassesDip within its own normal pullback band0.11
PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from0.42
FailsA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)12.90
PassesHigher-low structure still intactstructure intact · higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.
The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 6 carry no data.
PassesA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions6.00 · ≤ 10.00
PassesReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA12.53
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.08 · ≥ 1.20
PassesReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)3.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.
The badge above reads a pass with 1 of the checks below marked as failing. The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
FailsIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range(through fiscal 2026)0.7×
PassesEarnings estimates not being cut0.01
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.07
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.
The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
PassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)$276.8M · > 0
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)6.8% · ≥ 10.0%
FailsA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2026: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)0.5×
PassesQuality score ≥ 5057.30 · ≥ 50.00
PassesRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2021 to 2026)6.4% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.
The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context27.4% off its 52-week high
PassesReversal evidence3 of 4 signals fired
FailsTrap gate2 of 3 held
FailsQuality floor3 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$12.11
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.
The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
PassesTrading above its 50-day average12.47
PassesTrading above its 200-day average12.90
Fails50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)12.47
Passes50-day average sloping up0.12 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.
The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Passes3-month return in the top half of the universe0.91 · ≥ 0.50
Fails12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.42 · ≥ 0.50
PassesRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving0.01 · > 0
PassesEarnings estimates being revised up0.01
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.
The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
FailsMACD above its signal line0.13
PassesBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)6.00
FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)no higher high · higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.08 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.
The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Average daily swing: elevated0.05
Volatility band width: mid-range0.30
Distance from its 52-week high: mid-range0.27
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.

Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.

Methodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc. · Toronto, Canada

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.