$354.57+19.41 (+5.79%)
At close: Oct 26, 2026, 4:00 PM ET· NYSE · USD
Moog (MOG-B) Stock Checks
How MOG-B measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
Sources Company filings and computed by Tenet Filings and TenetScreens as of How we compute thisNot investment advice
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
1 / 17 qualify todayas of Oct 26, 2026 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
1
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
7
within one input of the gate
FAILS
7
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
2
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✕ FailsPassesROE ≥ 15%(TTM through Jun 27, 2026)18.2% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)27.4% · ≥ 40.0%
FailsNet margin ≥ 15%(TTM through Jun 27, 2026)8.8% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(quarter ending Jun 27, 2026)0.41 · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−7.6% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Buffett Quality under The screens ›Today's Buffett Quality list ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
~ 7 / 9PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)5.3% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$273.1M · > 0
PassesReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)5.1% → 5.3%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$273.1M vs $235.0M
PassesLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)21.4% → 21.3%
PassesCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)2.09 → 2.12
PassesNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)−0.9%
FailsGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)28.1% → 27.4%
FailsAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.89 → 0.87
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 7 of 9.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›Today's Piotroski F-Score list ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
~ BorderlineFailsROIC ≥ 15%(TTM through Jun 27, 2026)14.0% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)1.8× · ≤ 3.0×
PassesAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(TTM through Jun 27, 2026)5.06 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Munger Compounders under The screens ›Today's Munger Compounders list ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
✕ FailsPassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)$394.3M · > 0
FailsEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)3.4% · ≥ 6.0%
FailsReturn on capital ≥ 25%(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)17.4% · ≥ 25.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Magic Formula.The pass rule for Magic Formula is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›Today's Magic Formula® list ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
~ BorderlinePassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$10.8B · ≥ $2.0B
PassesCurrent ratio ≥ 2(quarter ending Jun 27, 2026)2.09 · ≥ 2.00
PassesPositive EPS 10y10y
PassesPays a dividend$1.15 · > 0
Not scored: see the reason belowEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr(fiscal 2020 to 2025)The five-year growth rate for this company is measured from a base year whose earnings were too small to divide by (below our $10M materiality floor), so the rate describes the size of that base rather than the growth. It is left unscored rather than counted either way.92.1% per year · ≥ 3.0%
FailsP/E ≤ 15(TTM through Jun 27, 2026)28.87 · ≤ 15.00
FailsP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5(TTM through Jun 27, 2026)140.44 · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›Today's Graham Defensive list ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 2 known)Not scored: see the reason belowPEG < 1 (hist. growth)(P/E TTM through Jun 27, 2026, EPS growth through fiscal 2025)The five-year growth rate for this company is measured from a base year whose earnings were too small to divide by (below our $10M materiality floor), so the rate describes the size of that base rather than the growth. It is left unscored rather than counted either way.0.31 · < 1.00
FailsEPS growth 10–30%(fiscal 2020 to 2025)92.1% per year · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›Today's Lynch GARP list ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
~ BorderlinePassesPays a dividend$1.15 · > 0
FailsYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)0.3% · 1.0%–8.0%
PassesCovered by free cash flow3.52 · ≥ 1.20
PassesEarnings payout not stretched15.5% · ≤ 75.0%
PassesBalance sheet can sustain the payout1.8× · ≤ 4.0×
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)4.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsNo cut on record
Fails5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr3.0% · ≥ 5.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety.The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
~ BorderlinePassesPays a dividend$1.15 · > 0
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)4.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsNo cut on record
Fails5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr3.0% · ≥ 5.0%
PassesCovered by free cash flow3.52 · ≥ 1.20
PassesPayout not stretched15.5% · ≤ 75.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Dividend Growth.The pass rule for Dividend Growth is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Dividend Growth under The screens ›Today's Dividend Growth list ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
✕ FailsFailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years0 of 3 on file
FailsRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years6.0% per year · ≥ 8.0%
PassesNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)−1.5% · ≤ 1.0%
FailsFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%3.3% · ≥ 12.0%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)1.28 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: holds. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check−1.5%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›Today's Quality Compounder list ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
✕ FailsUnknown — no dataOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)— · 8.0%–35.0%
FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.16
FailsNot past where its dips have historically recovered from1.76
PassesA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)282.91
FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure broken · no higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 6 carry no data.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✕ FailsFailsA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions11.00 · ≤ 10.00
FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA376.40
FailsPrinted a higher lowno
PassesA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.50 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)1.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
~ BorderlineFailsIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range(through fiscal 2025)0.9×
PassesEarnings estimates not being cut0.10
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.10
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✓ QualifiesPassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Industrials are still under review)$394.3M · > 0
PassesReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(TTM through Jun 27, 2026)14.0% · ≥ 10.0%
PassesA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(TTM through Jun 27, 2026)5.1×
PassesQuality score ≥ 5059.20 · ≥ 50.00
PassesRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2020 to 2025)6.0% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
— Insufficient inputs (4 of 4 known)A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context1 of 6 held · 2 no data
FailsReversal evidence1 of 4 signals fired
FailsTrap gate2 of 3 held
PassesQuality floor5 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$362.00
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. No price factors yet: the timing receipts populate after the nightly engine runs.Qualified Dip under The screens ›Today's Qualified Dip list ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
~ BorderlineFailsTrading above its 50-day average392.19
PassesTrading above its 200-day average282.91
Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)392.19
Passes50-day average sloping up0.01 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ FailsFails3-month return in the top half of the universe0.45 · ≥ 0.50
Passes12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.99 · ≥ 0.50
FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.00 · > 0
PassesEarnings estimates being revised up0.10
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ FailsFailsMACD above its signal line−8.33
FailsBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)11.00
FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)no higher high · no higher low
PassesA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.50 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: elevated0.03
Volatility band width: squeezed (compressed range)0.16
Distance from its 52-week high—
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Common questions
How many investing rule sets does Moog pass?
Moog qualifies on 1 of 17 rule sets as of 2026-10-26, with 7 borderline and 7 failing.
Does Moog meet the Graham Defensive criteria?
Moog is borderline on the Graham Defensive rule set as of 2026-10-26.
Does Moog meet the Buffett Quality criteria?
Moog fails the Buffett Quality rule set as of 2026-10-26.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.