⌕
Ferrari N.V. · RACE · NYSE
Tenet 65 · Solid
⇄ Compare
$387.30−5.55 (−1.41%)
At close: Oct 1, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
$389.11+1.81 (+0.47%)
Pre-market: Oct 2, 2026, 7:47 AM ET· last 1-minute bar

Ferrari N.V. · Tenets

How RACE measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.

The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).

6 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
6
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
7
within one input of the gate
FAILS
3
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
1
insufficient data to judge
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✓ Qualifies
PassesROE ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)45.4% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)51.7% · ≥ 40.0%
PassesNet margin ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)22.4% · ≥ 15.0%
Unknown — no dataDebt/equity ≤ 0.5— · ≤ 0.50
PassesGrowing FCF (multi-yr)(fiscal 2020 to 2025)59.9% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.
The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 5 carry no data.Buffett Quality under The screens ›
PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)16.6% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$2.8B · > 0
PassesReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)16.1% → 16.6%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$2.8B vs $1.9B
PassesLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)35.3% → 30.0%
PassesCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)5.10 → 5.70
PassesNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)−3.5%
PassesGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)50.1% → 51.7%
PassesAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.70 → 0.74
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.
The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 9 of 9.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›
PassesROIC ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)24.1% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)0.5× · ≤ 3.0×
PassesAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)9.88 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.
The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Munger Compounders under The screens ›
PassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)$2.5B · > 0
FailsEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)3.3% · ≥ 6.0%
Unknown — no dataReturn on capital ≥ 25%— · ≥ 25.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Magic Formula.
The pass rule for Magic Formula is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 3 carry no data.About this screen ›
PassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$68.7B · ≥ $2.0B
PassesCurrent ratio ≥ 2(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)5.70 · ≥ 2.00
PassesPositive EPS 10y10y
PassesPays a dividend$4.24 · > 0
PassesEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr(fiscal 2021 to 2025)23.6% per year · ≥ 3.0%
Unknown — no dataP/E ≤ 15— · ≤ 15.00
Unknown — no dataP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5— · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.
The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 2 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Unknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
PassesEPS growth 10–30%(fiscal 2021 to 2025)23.6% per year · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.
Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›
PassesPays a dividend$4.24 · > 0
PassesYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)1.1% · 1.0%–8.0%
PassesCovered by free cash flow2.63 · ≥ 1.20
PassesEarnings payout not stretched33.4% · ≤ 75.0%
PassesBalance sheet can sustain the payout0.5× · ≤ 4.0×
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)4.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsNo cut on record
Passes5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr22.5% · ≥ 5.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety.
The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
PassesPays a dividend$4.24 · > 0
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)4.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsNo cut on record
Passes5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr22.5% · ≥ 5.0%
PassesCovered by free cash flow2.63 · ≥ 1.20
PassesPayout not stretched33.4% · ≤ 75.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Dividend Growth.
The pass rule for Dividend Growth is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Dividend Growth under The screens ›
PassesReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years5 of 5
PassesRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years14.7% per year · ≥ 8.0%
FailsNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)4.0% · ≤ 1.0%
PassesFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%19.7% · ≥ 12.0%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)1.47 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: does not hold. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check4.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.
The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
PassesOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)23.2% · 8.0%–35.0%
FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.12
PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from0.64
PassesA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)367.02
PassesHigher-low structure still intactstructure intact · higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.
The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 6 carry no data.
Unknown — no dataA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions— · ≤ 10.00
FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA402.09
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)0.83 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)1.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.
The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 5 carry no data.
PassesIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range(through fiscal 2025)0.3×
PassesEarnings estimates not being cut0.02
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.24
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.
The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
PassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)$2.5B · > 0
PassesReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)24.1% · ≥ 10.0%
PassesA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2025: files no quarterly statements)9.9×
PassesQuality score ≥ 5080.70 · ≥ 50.00
PassesRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2020 to 2025)14.7% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.
The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context23.2% off its 52-week high
FailsReversal evidence1 of 4 signals fired
PassesTrap gate3 of 3 held
PassesQuality floor5 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$359.44
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.
The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
FailsTrading above its 50-day average407.23
PassesTrading above its 200-day average367.02
Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)407.23
Passes50-day average sloping up0.04 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.
The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Passes3-month return in the top half of the universe0.66 · ≥ 0.50
Fails12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.22 · ≥ 0.50
PassesRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving0.00 · > 0
PassesEarnings estimates being revised up0.02
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.
The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
FailsMACD above its signal line−3.19
Not scored: see the reason belowBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)This is a two-part reading (price back above the 50-day, and a bullish momentum cross inside 10 sessions) and a dated momentum cross is not on record for this name yet, so it is left unscored rather than counted either way.—
PassesHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)higher high · higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)0.83 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.
The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Average daily swing: normal0.02
Volatility band width: squeezed (compressed range)0.11
Distance from its 52-week high: mid-range0.23
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.

Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.

Methodology© 2026 Tenet Investing Inc. · Toronto, Canada

Data from Intrinio and Financial Modeling Prep.