$82.26+0.50 (+0.62%)
Market open · 15-min delayed · as of 1:22 PM ET
Southwest Gas Holdings Inc · Tenets
How SWX measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
0 / 17 qualify todayas of 2026-10-02 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
0
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
4
within one input of the gate
FAILS
13
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
0
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✕ FailsFailsROE ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)11.4% · ≥ 15.0%
PassesGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)46.3% · ≥ 40.0%
PassesNet margin ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)22.4% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)0.89 · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)Free cash flow was negative in fiscal 2025.no · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Buffett Quality under The screens ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
~ 7 / 9PassesReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)4.2% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$556.1M · > 0
PassesReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)1.7% → 4.2%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$556.1M vs $435.2M
FailsLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)29.0% → 32.9%
PassesCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)0.80 → 1.28
PassesNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)+0.4%
PassesGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)32.3% → 46.3%
FailsAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.21 → 0.19
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 7 of 9.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
✕ FailsFailsROIC ≥ 15%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)4.5% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)3.6× · ≤ 3.0×
FailsAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.05 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Munger Compounders.The pass rule for Munger Compounders is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Munger Compounders under The screens ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
✕ FailsPassesEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)$473.9M · > 0
FailsEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)5.4% · ≥ 6.0%
FailsReturn on capital ≥ 25%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)5.3% · ≥ 25.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Magic Formula.The pass rule for Magic Formula is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
~ BorderlinePassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$5.9B · ≥ $2.0B
FailsCurrent ratio ≥ 2(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.28 · ≥ 2.00
FailsPositive EPS 10y9y
PassesPays a dividend$2.48 · > 0
PassesEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr(fiscal 2020 to 2025)8.0% per year · ≥ 3.0%
PassesP/E ≤ 15(latest fiscal year: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)13.45 · ≤ 15.00
PassesP/E × P/B ≤ 22.520.11 · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Graham Defensive under The screens ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
✕ FailsFailsPEG < 1 (hist. growth)(through fiscal 2025)1.68 · < 1.00
FailsEPS growth 10–30%(fiscal 2020 to 2025)8.0% per year · 10.0%–30.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Lynch GARP.The pass rule for Lynch GARP is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Lynch GARP under The screens ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
✕ FailsPassesPays a dividend$2.48 · > 0
PassesYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)3.0% · 1.0%–8.0%
FailsCovered by free cash flow−1.41 · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched41.0% · ≤ 75.0%
PassesBalance sheet can sustain the payout3.6× · ≤ 4.0×
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)0.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsLast cut 1991
Fails5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr1.7% · ≥ 5.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety.The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 8 carry no data.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
✕ FailsPassesPays a dividend$2.48 · > 0
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)0.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsLast cut 1991
Fails5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr1.7% · ≥ 5.0%
FailsCovered by free cash flow−1.41 · ≥ 1.20
PassesPayout not stretched41.0% · ≤ 75.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Dividend Growth.The pass rule for Dividend Growth is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Dividend Growth under The screens ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
✕ FailsFailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years0 of 4 on file
FailsRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years−10.1% per year · ≥ 8.0%
FailsNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)4.9% · ≤ 1.0%
FailsFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%−13.0% · ≥ 12.0%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)1.28 · ≥ 1.00
Reading: does not hold. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check4.9%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
✕ FailsPassesOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)13.4% · 8.0%–35.0%
FailsDip within its own normal pullback band0.13
FailsNot past where its dips have historically recovered from3.05
FailsA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)87.58
FailsHigher-low structure still intactstructure broken · higher low
PassesClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)39.00 · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
✕ FailsUnknown — no dataA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions— · ≤ 10.00
FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA87.11
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)0.90 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)1.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 5 carry no data.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
~ BorderlineFailsIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range(through fiscal 2025)0.7×
PassesEarnings estimates not being cut0.00
PassesReturns on capital not deteriorating0.05
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✕ FailsPassesOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)$473.9M · > 0
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)4.5% · ≥ 10.0%
FailsA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(fiscal 2025: its last four quarters do not add up to its fiscal year)1.1×
PassesQuality score ≥ 5050.90 · ≥ 50.00
FailsRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−10.1% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
~ BorderlineA research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context13.4% off its 52-week high
FailsReversal evidence1 of 4 signals fired
FailsTrap gate2 of 3 held
FailsQuality floor2 of 5 held
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$89.05
Decided by the pass rule for Qualified Dip.The pass rule for Qualified Dip is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Qualified Dip under The screens ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ FailsFailsTrading above its 50-day average88.50
FailsTrading above its 200-day average87.58
Passes50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)88.50
Fails50-day average sloping up−0.03 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ FailsFails3-month return in the top half of the universe0.42 · ≥ 0.50
Passes12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.55 · ≥ 0.50
FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.00 · > 0
PassesEarnings estimates being revised up0.00
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ FailsFailsMACD above its signal line−2.06
Not scored: see the reason belowBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)This is a two-part reading (price back above the 50-day, and a bullish momentum cross inside 10 sessions) and a dated momentum cross is not on record for this name yet, so it is left unscored rather than counted either way.—
FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)no higher high · higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)0.90 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 4 carry no data.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: normal0.02
Volatility band width: expanded (wide range)0.99
Distance from its 52-week high: a modest pullback0.13
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.