$44.47+1.93 (+4.54%)
At close: Oct 23, 2026, 4:00 PM ET· NYSE · USD
Molson Coors Brewing (TAP-A) Stock Checks
How TAP-A measures up against value, income, timing, and long-hold tenets. Every criterion shows the live number and the pass rule. Always free.
Sources Company filings and computed by Tenet Filings and TenetScreens as of How we compute thisNot investment advice
The tenets below and the 0-100 Tenet Score on this report are two separate computations: each tenet runs its own criteria and its own pass rule, while the score is a percentile composite reported as one of four verdict words (Strong, Solid, Mixed or Weak).
0 / 17 qualify todayas of Oct 26, 2026 · computed nightly from our fundamentals DB; point-in-time auditable.
QUALIFIES
0
meet every gate today
BORDERLINE
4
within one input of the gate
FAILS
9
miss at least one gate
UNKNOWN
4
insufficient data to judge
passesfailsborderlineunknown
Value — six classic philosophies
Buffett Qualitydurable moat
✕ FailsFailsROE ≥ 15%(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)−19.7% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsGross margin ≥ 40%(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Consumer Defensive are still under review)32.8% · ≥ 40.0%
FailsNet margin ≥ 15%(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)−18.2% · ≥ 15.0%
FailsDebt/equity ≤ 0.5(quarter ending Jun 30, 2026)0.74 · ≤ 0.50
FailsGrowing FCF (multi-yr)(fiscal 2020 to 2025)−1.0% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Buffett Quality.The pass rule for Buffett Quality is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here.Buffett Quality under The screens ›Today's Buffett Quality list ›
Piotroski F-Scorefinancial strength
✕ 5 / 9FailsReturn on assets positive(fiscal 2025)−9.6% · > 0
PassesOperating cash flow positive(fiscal 2025)$1.8B · > 0
FailsReturn on assets improving(fiscal 2025)4.4% → −9.6%
PassesEarnings backed by cash (CFO > net income)(fiscal 2025)$1.8B vs −$2.2B
PassesLeverage falling (long-term debt / assets)(fiscal 2025)23.5% → 17.0%
FailsCurrent ratio improving(fiscal 2025)0.94 → 0.55
PassesNo share dilution (≤ +2%)(fiscal 2025)−5.1%
FailsGross margin expanding(fiscal 2025)33.0% → 32.8%
PassesAsset turnover improving(fiscal 2025)0.53 → 0.57
Decided by the pass rule for Piotroski F-Score.The pass rule for Piotroski F-Score is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. These checks score 5 of 9.Piotroski F-Score under The screens ›Today's Piotroski F-Score list ›
Munger Compoundershigh-ROIC quality
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)Unknown — no dataROIC ≥ 15%— · ≥ 15.0%
Unknown — no dataNet debt/EBITDA ≤ 3×— · ≤ 3.0×
FailsAltman Z ≥ 3 (safe zone)(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)0.81 · ≥ 3.00
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data.Munger Compounders under The screens ›Today's Munger Compounders list ›
Magic FormulaROC + earnings yield (threshold check; full rank needs universe)
— Insufficient inputs (1 of 3 known)FailsEBIT > 0(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Consumer Defensive are still under review)−$2.3B · > 0
Unknown — no dataEarnings yield EBIT/EV ≥ 6%— · ≥ 6.0%
Unknown — no dataReturn on capital ≥ 25%— · ≥ 25.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. 1 of 3 checks below carry data. The pass rule for Magic Formula is not published separately on the methodology page.About this screen ›Today's Magic Formula® list ›
Graham Defensivemargin of safety
✕ FailsPassesSize: market cap ≥ $2B$7.3B · ≥ $2.0B
FailsCurrent ratio ≥ 2(quarter ending Jun 30, 2026)0.88 · ≥ 2.00
FailsPositive EPS 10y7y
PassesPays a dividend$1.88 · > 0
Unknown — no dataEPS growth ≥ 3%/yr— · ≥ 3.0%
Unknown — no dataP/E ≤ 15— · ≤ 15.00
Unknown — no dataP/E × P/B ≤ 22.5— · ≤ 22.50
Decided by the pass rule for Graham Defensive.The pass rule for Graham Defensive is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 3 of 7 carry no data.Graham Defensive under The screens ›Today's Graham Defensive list ›
Lynch GARPgrowth at reasonable price (historical-CAGR basis)
— UnknownUnknown — no dataPEG < 1 (hist. growth)— · < 1.00
Unknown — no dataEPS growth 10–30%— · 10.0%–30.0%
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. None of the 2 checks below carry data.Lynch GARP under The screens ›Today's Lynch GARP list ›
Income — dividend safety
Income & Dividend Safetycoverage over headline yield
~ BorderlinePassesPays a dividend$1.88 · > 0
PassesYield in a healthy band (not a yield trap)4.2% · 1.0%–8.0%
PassesCovered by free cash flow2.84 · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataEarnings payout not stretched−17.3% · ≤ 75.0%
Unknown — no dataBalance sheet can sustain the payout— · ≤ 4.0×
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)4.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsLast cut 2020
Fails5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr−3.8% · ≥ 5.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety.The pass rule for Income & Dividend Safety is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 8 carry no data.
Dividend Growthraises you can count on
~ BorderlinePassesPays a dividend$1.88 · > 0
FailsAnnual dividend raised 10+ years running (Aristocrat ≥25, King ≥50)4.00 · ≥ 10.00
PassesNo dividend cut in the last 5 yearsLast cut 2020
Fails5-year dividend growth ≥ 5%/yr−3.8% · ≥ 5.0%
PassesCovered by free cash flow2.84 · ≥ 1.20
Unknown — no dataPayout not stretched— · ≤ 75.0%
Decided by the pass rule for Dividend Growth.The pass rule for Dividend Growth is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 6 carry no data.Dividend Growth under The screens ›Today's Dividend Growth list ›
Long Hold — quality compounders
Quality Compounderhigh returns, reinvested, few new shares
✕ FailsFailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 15% in 4+ of the last 5 years0 of 4 on file
FailsRevenue compounding ≥ 8%/yr over 5 years2.2% per year · ≥ 8.0%
PassesNot diluting: diluted share count flat-to-down (≤ +1%/yr)−1.4% · ≤ 1.0%
FailsFree cash flow margin ≥ 12%10.3% · ≥ 12.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowEarnings backed by cash (operating cash flow ≥ net income)A loss year makes cash-vs-earnings unreadable: the ratio inverts over negative net income, so it is not scored (never counted against).— · ≥ 1.00
Reading: holds. Not a gate checkDisciplined buybacks: actively reducing the share count (bonus)reading, not a gate check−1.4%
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Compounder.The pass rule for Quality Compounder is what decides that verdict, and it is not restated here. 1 of 5 carry no data. Lines marked as readings are published beside the checks and are not gate checks.Quality Compounder under The screens ›Today's Quality Compounder list ›
Timing — dip & swing receipts
Drawdown Contexta dip, not a collapse
~ BorderlineUnknown — no dataOff its 52-week high by 8–35% (a dip, not a collapse)— · 8.0%–35.0%
PassesDip within its own normal pullback band0.18
PassesNot past where its dips have historically recovered from0.41
FailsA dip in an uptrend (above a rising 200-day)55.44
PassesHigher-low structure still intactstructure intact · higher low
Unknown — no dataClear of the earnings blackout (more than 5 days out)— · > 5.00
Decided by the pass rule for Drawdown Context.The pass rule for Drawdown Context is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 2 of 6 carry no data.
Reversal Evidencedaily close onlysigns the pullback is turning
~ BorderlinePassesA bullish MACD cross within 10 sessions0.00 · ≤ 10.00
FailsReclaimed a rising 50-day EMA45.32
PassesPrinted a higher lowyes
FailsA volume thrust on the turn (≥ 1.2× normal)1.09 · ≥ 1.20
FailsReversal signals fired: 3 of 4 (MACD·MA·HL·Vol)2.00 · ≥ 3.00
Decided by the pass rule for Reversal Evidence.The pass rule for Reversal Evidence is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Not-a-Value-Trap Gatecheap for a good reason, not a broken one
✕ FailsPassesIn the cheap half of its own 5-year valuation range(through fiscal 2025)0.2×
FailsEarnings estimates not being cut−0.01
FailsReturns on capital not deteriorating−0.10
Decided by the pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate.The pass rule for Not-a-Value-Trap Gate is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Quality Floorpasses the quality/value gate on this dip
✕ FailsFailsOperating profit is positive(fiscal 2025: trailing figures for Consumer Defensive are still under review)−$2.3B · > 0
FailsReturn on invested capital ≥ 10%(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)−14.0% · ≥ 10.0%
Not scored: see the reason belowA solvent balance sheet (Altman Z ≥ 1.8, net debt/EBITDA ≤ 4)(TTM through Jun 30, 2026)Net debt / EBITDA cannot be read over non-positive EBITDA: the ratio flips sign, so a net-cash company prints a healthy-looking positive. Only the Altman Z half, shown beside this line, is measurable, so the test is left unscored rather than counted either way.0.8×
FailsQuality score ≥ 5016.80 · ≥ 50.00
PassesRevenue growing over 5 years(fiscal 2020 to 2025)2.2% per year · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Quality Floor.The pass rule for Quality Floor is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page. 1 of 5 carry no data.
Qualified Dipa pullback with receipts, not a falling knife
— Insufficient inputs (4 of 4 known)A research signal from published criteria, not a recommendation.
FailsDrawdown context3 of 6 held · 2 no data
FailsReversal evidence2 of 4 signals fired
FailsTrap gate1 of 3 held
FailsQuality floor1 of 5 held · 1 no data
Invalidation level (structure break): below this the dip's structure has broken$39.51
Verdict Unknown for this set.Verdict Unknown for this set. No price factors yet: the timing receipts populate after the nightly engine runs.Qualified Dip under The screens ›Today's Qualified Dip list ›
Trend Alignmentprice in a confirmed uptrend
✕ FailsFailsTrading above its 50-day average45.94
FailsTrading above its 200-day average55.44
Fails50-day average above the 200-day (uptrend stack)45.94
Fails50-day average sloping up−0.04 · > 0
Decided by the pass rule for Trend Alignment.The pass rule for Trend Alignment is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Relative Strengthoutperforming, ranked vs the universe
✕ FailsPasses3-month return in the top half of the universe0.60 · ≥ 0.50
Fails12-minus-1 momentum in the top half of the universe0.11 · ≥ 0.50
FailsRelative strength vs the S&P 500 improving−0.01 · > 0
FailsEarnings estimates being revised up−0.01
Decided by the pass rule for Relative Strength.The pass rule for Relative Strength is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Momentum Triggera trigger you can see
✕ FailsPassesMACD above its signal line−0.84
FailsBack above the 50-day on a fresh cross (≤10 sessions)0.00
FailsHigher high and higher low (stair-stepping up)no higher high · higher low
FailsA volume thrust on the move (≥ 1.2× normal)1.09 · ≥ 1.20
Decided by the pass rule for Momentum Trigger.The pass rule for Momentum Trigger is what decides that verdict, and it is not published separately on the methodology page.
Volatility Regimecontext, not a signal
Context, not scoredAverage daily swing: high0.05
Volatility band width: mid-range0.45
Distance from its 52-week high—
✓
Every verdict is auditableEach criterion shows the live number and the pass rule side by side — a receipt, not a rating. Several of these screens publish their rule in full under The screens; each row links to its own section where there is one.
!
Unknown ≠ failAn “— Unknown” verdict means the inputs were insufficient: context, not a signal, and never counted as a fail.
Common questions
How many investing rule sets does Molson Coors Brewing pass?
Molson Coors Brewing qualifies on 0 of 17 rule sets as of 2026-10-26, with 4 borderline and 9 failing.
Does Molson Coors Brewing meet the Graham Defensive criteria?
Molson Coors Brewing fails the Graham Defensive rule set as of 2026-10-26.
Does Molson Coors Brewing meet the Buffett Quality criteria?
Molson Coors Brewing fails the Buffett Quality rule set as of 2026-10-26.
Computed from our fundamentals DB; historical-CAGR PEG basis for Lynch. Research, not investment advice. Tenet's rulesets are independently developed from publicly available sources, and Tenet is not affiliated with, sponsored by, endorsed by or otherwise associated with any referenced investor or trademark owner. Full notice. MAGIC FORMULA is a trademark of MagicFormulaInvesting.com LLC.